Quote:
Originally Posted by Vampyr
Yes, but I said to only vote for him for as long as it took to see if anyone would resist the change. At first the majority was focused on Germantor, and no one said anything. Then the majority was focused on Uber, and no one said anything.
Then the majority was on Swan, and suddenly a group of people cared.
When I initially voted for Swan, it was due to him making the huge sized font post, and I said "If the majority moves towards him, and no one really complains, we'll know he's not crazy, but if a group of people fight against it, then that mean's he is crazy."
I was more than willing to vote for someone other than Swan, if you all weren't making it so suspicious that he's part of a group with you. Not only didn't you vote for him, which I could never have really held against you, but you vehemently defended him.
And now that Uber is here, why aren't you shifting your votes to someone else who hasn't participated very much? There are a couple. Instead you're shifting them to me, someone who is very interested in the game and enjoying it. You're being contradictory to your own reasoning on that point.
|
You're trying to twist it as if we're protecting Swan.
We're not.
You can say "You sound like you're protecting him" or "Seems like you care about him" to all of us as much as you want to win over your followers.
But like you said, you picked him
at random.
So we both know, and we all know - it has nothing to do with it being Swan.
But I await your "It sounds like you're backing Swan really fast" post in return to this one.
You don't know if he's a crazy or not.
You just want to randomly kill someone, and want to see who follows you.
We want to stop you from
randomly killing
anyone.
The reason now, we're not going after people who aren't playing, is because we have a reason to actually vote for someone now.
The reason of an attempt at blatent manipulation.