Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jonbo298
First, I expected my comment to be taken out of context. Congratulations on doing that.
What I meant was sometimes people look at something on the cover and buy it. Granted, $500-$600 is alot but it could also take a consumer that doesn't know much, see a sexy box with what looks to be a sexy product inside and wonder how they can get ahold of it. I'm not trying to say "OMGWTF BAD BOX SONY LOOSES LOLWTFLMFAO" in case you think I am.
|
Wait, how was your quote taken out of context? You were talking about weak-minded consumers basing their purchase on the quality of a box, right? I simply said you were right and gave an example of what such a person (obviously weak-minded) might say. I was not trying to imply that you are such a person.
However, I did get one part wrong. Based on what I have quoted, it appears you were trying to imply that a weak-minded consumer might
buy the product based on the
quality of the box. Perhaps it was hard to see that perspective of your post, as that conclusion is non-sequitor when put in context with the general criticism of the box previously expressed within the thread.
And finally, when I said you could support your argument with a post from this thread, I was not referring to your post. I'm sorry I didn't insult you
