Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeathsHand
If President B is shoved into office due to the deaths of President A and the 5 others below him, I'd say it's most likely that President B will not be as good as President A... Or at least not immediately so...
Presidents elected under normal circumstances have had time to dedicate to researching and planning (goals, catchy phrasing of words, etc)...
Even after they officially win the election, they have a couple months before they actually take office...
Seems fairly obvious...
|
Thank you. Dear God, thank you.
And Typhoid, as for what I said being below me, I've said far worse,
especially to you. If THAT hurt your feelings, I have not been doing my job well at all for the past few years. Just remember, each one of my many barbs comes dipped in honey with a side of love... before I beat you in the head with the golden logic baseball-bat. This only sounds like an arrogant statement because it
is and
I am.
On a side note, the Iraqi peacekeepers and Us military need to hop of the good foot and get with the terrorist killing. Zarqawi's death is an excellent opportunity to pour on the pressure and convert more former enemies into informants. If they don't start in the next week or so, I fear that Typhoid's prediction may come true and the US and Iraqi governments may let a new Zarqawi settle in and get comfy. It will take a good bit for the new leader to take control, but worry we may give him that good bit. The key here is the take advantage of the chaos in Al Quaida, create more chaos for them and then give them enough slack so that they hand themselves with sloppy communications and organization.