I haven't watched it yet I'm in a rush and I should probably wait to post.
I agree with Strangler that if a conspiracy by Bush to kill our own people to start a war is what's being insinuated then it's stupid.
However, I just watched a video of a seminar at Brigam Young University about how the towers fell. One Dr. Steve Jones a professor of physics I believe there at BYU, gave the seminar. This link might be the same video, I'm not sure if they're exactly the same, but the seminar itself is probably the same.
http://www.911blogger.com/2006/02/dr...nar-video.html
There are a lot of scientific holes in the official story of what brought the towers down. For example, there was molten metal found in the basement of not just the twin towers but also the WTC 7 building which collapsed inexplicably, inexplicably even by I believe FEMA's report which can't explain it. Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel or iron, and anyway there was no jet fuel in the WTC 7 building yet it collapsed.
Well I've already taken more time than I should have.
My point is, I've always thought the same thing, conspiracy theories are bunk. But there seem to be some true scientific holes in the official theory of how the three buildings collapsed, holes that are being backed up with real science not just conspiracy theories. And I think it's right to ask questions when the science behind the official story doesn't make any sense.