GameTavern - View Single Post

Dyne · 11-20-2005, 04:20 PM

Well as a reader for none of the books, I thought it wasn't that bad. I think this thread just has a case of the "the book was better" complex. There's nothing wrong with that, though.

I think the people who liked it AND read the book had forgotten most of the book in the first place.

The pace didn't really commit any crimes. And Cedric had enough screen time - he was shown to harry as both the Cho-stealer and the competitor. The quasi-climax of Harry saving him and getting the goblet was pretty much enough to pass.

11-20-2005, 04:20 PM	#12
Dyne Or should I say.. smanger Dyne is offline Location: Vancouver Now Playing: Infinity Blade II, Duke Nukem Forever, Skyrim, Vanquish Posts: 9,435	Re: Harry Potter: Goblet of Fire Well as a reader for none of the books, I thought it wasn't that bad. I think this thread just has a case of the "the book was better" complex. There's nothing wrong with that, though. I think the people who liked it AND read the book had forgotten most of the book in the first place. The pace didn't really commit any crimes. And Cedric had enough screen time - he was shown to harry as both the Cho-stealer and the competitor. The quasi-climax of Harry saving him and getting the goblet was pretty much enough to pass.