[Professor S]

Why not blame science? Afterall, science has killed far more people than any God or Religion.

Steel - Blades
Gunpowder - Guns and explosives
Nuclear Fission - The Big One

Instead, this person prefers to blame religion, a ideal that in most cases preaches against the darkest parts of our humanity that cause us to kill and commit violence. So shouldn't science be attacked and blamed for our faults and weaknesses? Hasn't science killed millions upon millions of people and given us the ever increasing ability to kill more and more at a time? Did the researcher even consider scientific advancements in societies and their correlation to increased violence when compared to religion?

Or better yet, why don't we stop BLAMING everything but ourselves for what we are and do, and address the actual PROBLEMS. This guy makes the same mistakes in his argument that anti-gun and anti-media violence people make. They remove responsibility from our society to govern and control itself and constantly points the blame to a neculous and nearly unprovable "evil".

Arguments of this type are typical of what I call the "Reverse Society". People that want to try and build a uptopian nirvana from the top down, instead of the bottom up. Confused? Here is my argument:

Society is meant to be built, for the lack of a better model, like a pyramid, with the most important aspects at the bottom:

The World Community
National Government/Culture
Local Government/Culture
Family/Self

If the base is solid, then it will support the upper levels.

Meanwhile those that want to propose the "Reverse Society" want to try and build the uptopia starting with The World Community.

Family/Self
Local Government/Culture
National Government/Culture
The World Community

This model is not new, it is simply communism by another and more friendly name. Proponents of this are those like Parliament member George Galloway, who I believe is one of the most demented and dangerous people I've ever heard speak.

Make no mistake, the Reverse Society sounds wonderful, and pretends to be a world family to replace the nuclear and extebded families that we know, but it will damage us terribly.

Family is the single most powerful force in human development. Without family, nothing that we have achieved would ever be possible. We cannot care about others without learning empathy in our early years. Without family, there is no caring for others, local or worldwide. Its a psychological fact. If you are not TOUCHED enough as an infant, you will grow to be functionally retarded.

Religion has been a powerful force in creating what we know as the family. I really don't think that people unserstand how powerful Western religion has been in forming even what we consider to be "secular" beliefs. Just compare the ideals of what being a good Roman is, which was a very secular society, when compared to what being a good Christian entails or even just a good, moral person. Jews are an excellent example of how string and important religion is in the family. Jews through the ages have endure more persecution than any other people, and they survived because of their belief in family. They invested their money in themselves, creating banks and businesses to look out for their family first and their fellow Jews second. This is how they survived and any secular group would have disintegrated under such horrors, IMO.

If you want to create the perfect society and reduce man's inhumanity to man, look towards yourself and your loved ones first, then once they are in order look to the next level to create a world community.

"Physician, heal thyself"