[gekko]

But HD-DVD now has 3-layered capability, giving it only 5GB less than Blu-Ray, but by having the multiple discs (single, dual, triple layered) it saves on costs if you don't need it so big.

And HD-DVD can do triple-layered HD-DVD on one side, and dual-layered DVD on the other, creating hybrid discs to bridge the gap during the transition period.

Also, HD-DVD can be made on current production facilities.

But Blu-Ray has more support for it, and why not find a way to triple-layer the current Blu-Ray disc, getting 75GB out of it?

The debate goes on...