View Single Post

Re: Giving George W. Bush His Due on Democracy
Old 04-05-2005, 01:21 PM   #20
MuGen
Fuuton Rasenshuriken
 
MuGen's Avatar
 
MuGen is offline
Location: Cali
Now Playing: Enchanted Arms PS3
Posts: 2,483
Default Re: Giving George W. Bush His Due on Democracy

This just proves that the cycle of life is actually evident. The fact that we're yet again arguing about Iraq War and Bush's foreign policies, proves it. Cycle has always been defined as a never-changing, repetition of events.

An article was posted about Bush and the accomplishments he's done amidst all of the scrutiny and left wing malice. Yet, we find a way to spark another argument about Goerge W. Bush. I'll have to agree with a lot of people in this thread.

Many people attack Bush's policies and his decision to go to war, and whether his intentions were genuine or for oil. But the simple factors of GAS prices will inevitably fabricate another momentous debate on WHY they are rising. As one of my colleagues said,
"I guess we didn't go to war for the oil...."

And Strangler, you have just earned my respect for looking beyond what is in front of your face. A great example is Patch Adams when a man saw 7 fingers, but they thought he was crazy.... Has he not said, "Look beyond the answer." I would not have understood him. Strangler, your play with numbers intrigues me and has greatly swayed my outlook on whether the war was for good or for worse. Of course WAR in general is summed up as a bad thing considering casualties and unnecessary bloodshed. But the way you put it, that there were a lot more casualties before the War w/ Iraq.... it totally makes sense.

A lot of our disputes are fueled by what the media feeds us. And we all have argued about what the media thrives on. We can't go face to face with our leaders and other leaders and get the scoop from them. We watch the news, and get our spin on things. Our debates are driven by what we know from news and media. So, in the end we all either are far left or far right, considering if we were all left or all right, the balance beam would topple over, and we certainly cannot have a world without balance.

Without war, there would be no peace. Without hate, there would be no love. So how would be define these things if there were none? Consider a world without war and total happiness. Would there still be a word PEACE? If there were a world without hate, would the word LOVE or LIKE still exist?

Disputes and debates are driven by the media today, and what we believe. There is no exact or accurate way of changing ones thinking....Sometimes I miss being a baby where ignorance was bliss.

Hard to say about life these days.
__________________
  Reply With Quote