View Single Post

Re: New Bands Semi-Finals Nirvana vs. Red Hot Chili Peppers
Old 07-21-2004, 01:02 AM   #10
Typhoid
Anthropomorphic
 
Typhoid's Avatar
 
Typhoid is offline
Location: New Caladonia
Now Playing:
Posts: 9,511
Default Re: New Bands Semi-Finals Nirvana vs. Red Hot Chili Peppers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Null
actually, they're still underrated, but its getting to the point where they're getting what they deserve.

and the simplicity of most thier songs was by design, peppers are good, and still one of the better bands, but they're one of the crowd in terms of sound. many bands sound like them.

nirvanas songs still sound like they're new, they dont sound dated.

i dont really want to put a lot against peppers, cuz i do like them for the most part, my gripe being thier songs get old fast.

nirvana was just a better band.

Yeah, i agree too.

The only reason a Nirvana song seems old and outdated, is because its a Nirvana song, and everyone knows its old.

But their music sounds almost the same as some of the popular music out today, their music is still somehow fresh and new.

While i like the chilies, the did kinda sell out to the styles of music that was popular at the time, dont get me wrong, i kinda like them, but still.

Like in the 80's they were more rap, early 90's it was more raw rock stuff, and for the majority now its kinda soft and *****-ish compared to what they used to do.

Like for example, compare "Fight like a brave" to " By the way". By the way sounds like they didnt even make it. Although i like both songs.
__________________
Fingerbang:
1.) The sexual act where a finger is inserted into the vagina or anus.
Headbang:
1.) To vigorously nod your head up and down.
  Reply With Quote