[Jonbo298]

Originally Posted by Jonbo298

When Miyamoto said that they made this zelda more mature because Link is a teenager, it got me thinking. WW was told from the perspective of a kid link. And kids always like bright stuff and whatnot. And now that Link is older, everything is more dark and realistic around him. And tells everything like it is. So this can still be called WW2 because now its a few years later and link is a teen that sees things in a darker way then when he was a kid.

I'm quoting myself

But I have proof to my speculation on the more realistic look. Q/A in interview http://wham.canoe.ca/gcn/topspot/2004/05/19/465640.html

Wham! Gaming: Are you moving to this more realistic version of Link because it¹s what people wanted, or did you have it mind all along?

Shigeru Miyamoto: Maybe it’s a little bit of both (laughs). When we did Ocarina of Time, obviously that was a game where you started off as a child and matured into an adult. But earlier on when we were developing the game, we started off developing it around an adult Link, and because of that we chose the graphical style we did with Ocarina of Time.
Whereas with Wind Waker, we knew from the get-go that it was going to be entirely a story about Link as a young boy, and with that in mind we thought about the best way to express the story of a young boy, and how we could best create a reality in this world of Zelda using a graphical style. And the decision was that by going with this ‘toon-shading’ style, we can better express a young boy and better show his movements and make a more cohesive, realistic-feeling world.
But at that time, obviously, we still had questions about if we’ve gone with this decision because Link’s a boy, what do we do the next time when we decide to make a game when Link is more grown up, and how are we going to create Link in a cel-shaded style as an adult. After a lot of discussion, what we decided was the best graphical presentation for an adult link was this style.