Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stonecutter
Wait wait wait wait wait wait.
Boo on 1942, but you love Onslaught.
Onslaught basicly is 1942. You "capture" certian points on a map and try and storm the enemies base. Ok, sure, you have to blow up the generator rather than bleed tickets, and there's no real bonus for killing other players, but, essentially, Onslaught is a poor mans (or rich man's, depending on how you look at it) BF1942.
That being said, I do really, really like onslaught, but I prefer Assault.
|
ok. i didnt say i didnt like the style 1942 is. i didnt say i didnt like the idea of it. however that is one glitchy game. much of the time it chops around. (not choppy. but i mean...example i lie down and it'll jerk for a sec) i think the levels are absolutly BORING.
That being said, Onslaught is actually QUITE differnt. one thing that is in onslught that i truely like is the node system. People arent running around doing thier own thing tryin to get differnt points. At any given time there are only a couple points that you can attac, you ALWAYS know where the action is instead of going looking for it.
Plus UT takes more combat skills. dodging and such. 1942 you basically see someone shoot a couple bullets and hes dead.
i like Battlefield Vietnam much better because of the level design and the forests you can hide in. adds more to it.