Quote:
Well that sounds like a self-fulfilling prophecy to me. If there isn't an attack because we are over there, it can never be proved thats the reason so then there is no reason to have troops there. Its cyclical logic. Also, we were convinced that there would ever be an attack on US soil before 9/11. See what assuming gets you?
Me? I feel safer taking the fight to them than just continuing to be a punching bg as the West has been for the past 30 years prior to 9/11.
Quote:
And what makes me sad is that 8000 Iraqi civilians have been killed since America went into Iraq.
And over 400,000 have been found in mass graves (estimated total of over 1 million), killed by their own leader who we removed from power. I think thats a pretty good trade off, don't you?
Ace, good luck and keep safe. Also know that you are doing good in this world while being over there, unlike what some would rather have you believe.
|
I feel really bad about starting this up for the....uhh...i kinda lost count......
, but there isn't any proof that Saddam and Al Quieda were linked.....