Elections
 

Would you be in favor of elections of moderators?

Re: Elections
 

Ah..I hit yes, when I meant no. I don't favor it because they are apointed because of their quality..and well it isn't really that big of a thing to pick them.

Re: Elections
 

yeah, I think elections would cause more problems than good. I think it should be the choice of the people who run the site...doesn't seem fair to throw that into the hands of us lowly normal members.

Re: Elections
 

Eh I put yes. I mean, why not? As long as we always have some governing person who can always give or taketh away the mod job if someone does a bad job.

Re: Elections
 

I said no basically because of the above reasons mentioned. Its Quality over Popularity for mod positions.

Re: Elections
 

what all the other "no" people said...

Re: Elections
 

I concur.

Re: Elections
 

I pushed yes before thinking about it.

I think no votes is better.

Pick through reliablity and maturity, thats what I think.

Re: Elections
 

:rofl:
I chose no, because we need some moderating qualities, not popularity. :)

Re: Elections
 

I agree with no... you'll also get stupid promises and alliences and crap, you know, like in "real" politics.

Re: Elections
 

Definitely a no. I don't want popular moderators. I want moderators chosen because those who run the place think they will do their job.

Re: Elections
 

yeah, what everyone else said

Re: Elections
 

Absolutly, because when it fails, the fourm can't complain!

Re: Elections
 

They should make me a moderator.

Re: Elections
 

and me an administrator