![]() |
Zelda Wind Waker doesn't get a Platinum from EGM....
Wow, I am kind of dissapointed. Really, the score was awesome but not a platinum.
10, 10, and a 9.5 |
I think it's weird that you're dissapointed. The average of those three scores is about 98%. What is there to be dissapointed about? I'd say you're expectations are beyond reasonable. Besides, other's opinions of video games should not shadow your own enjoyment for a game. Nor should it have an affect on your own personal opinion of the game.
|
You have to remember that the game is 5 years old pretty much. Other games have built off of OOT's inventive gameplay mechanics. As good as OOT is...it's slipped a bit due to other games getting better. That's one hella good score for a 5 year old game.
|
Quote:
Psssssttttt.......he's talking about the new Zelda game. ;) |
Quote:
just messing man, but this Is Wind Waker we're talking bout here...it aint 5 years old. |
Quote:
Kind of like if 5 years from now, GTA was still using the exact same kind of gameplay and all... or something... although there will probably be more GTA games in 5 years then there would be Zelda :p |
bah..i was talking about oot.
*crawls under his bed* EDIT: As for Zelda: WW not getting platinum...i haven't played it yet so I'll reserve judgement. |
Quote:
Anyways, Zelda is awesome, and I am proud of the scores, but I made a bet with my friend that it will get a Platinum in the next EGM. But see, I lost the bet by a damn 0.5. :( Other than that, don't you guys get the wrong idea about me. I am not like that, it's just I want great games to get a Platinum. After playing Halo, I was glad to see what it got. Same with other games like OoT and Vice City. |
Ok, sorry for the misunderstanding.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And guys, I also found this.... Greg: Overall- 10 visuals-10 sound- 9 ingenuity- 7 replay-5 Shane: Overall- 10 visuals-10 sound- 9 ingenuity- 8 replay-7 Mark: Overall- 9.5 visuals-10 sound- 8 ingenuity- 9 replay-7 The review is 5 pages long and higly comprehensive. Graphics do deserve a 10... It really sucks you into the game. But wahtever... I think Mark gave it a 9.5 because he said it got annoying at one part having to go through the water.. But whatever, Zelda is awesome to me... and I enjoy the game more than what some people have to say about it. And also, has anyone noticed how some reviewers have gotten a bit more striced after 2002? |
*must resist replying....can't....resist!* I personally am dissapointed. I was more then expecting for Zelda to get a Platinum. After all the 10's in Japan (with the exception of 1 or 2 lowly mages:D), I am very surprised to hear a 9.5 from an EGM reviewer. And I agree, I think EGM is a little stricter now. I am very pissed now. *continues break :sneaky:*
|
Quote:
Damn, your sig is so nice.................. |
:sneaky:
Well.. uh.. on topic, I think that people will like this game regardless. Lately people have been labelling whole games as trash just because a few elements were executed poorly. Look at Super Mario Sunshine--it was a great game, but because a few things sucked, some people said it was the worst game they've ever played. WTF? Those people just confuse me. Hopefully it doesn't happen with Zelda at all--I've been looking forward to it and I don't care if reviews are a little off. It's a game and I want to enjoy it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern