![]() |
Nuclear Renaissance??
Quote:
Source: http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/02/17/b...ex.html?hpt=C1 |
Re: Nuclear Renaissance??
Jeeze, how awesome would that be.
|
Re: Nuclear Renaissance??
Yeah I just read about this. It reminds me of a Wired article on Thorium.
![]() Fuel Uranium fuel rods Fuel input per gigawatt output 250 tons raw uranium Annual fuel cost for 1-GW reactor $50-60 million Coolant Water Proliferation potential Medium Footprint 200,000-300,000 square feet, surrounded by a low-density population zone ![]() Fuel Thorium oxide and uranium oxide rods Fuel input per gigawatt output 4.6 tons raw thorium, 177 tons raw uranium Annual fuel cost for 1-GW reactor $50-60 million Coolant Water Proliferation potential None Footprint 200,000-300,000 square feet, surrounded by a low-density population zone ![]() Fuel Thorium and uranium fluoride solution Fuel input per gigawatt output 1 ton raw thorium Annual fuel cost for 1-GW reactor $10,000 (estimated) Coolant Self-regulating Proliferation potential None Footprint 2,000-3,000 square feet, with no need for a buffer zone http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/1...ew_nukes/all/1 And the upside is, thorium reactors are being made right now. In fact, they were first made some four decades ago. The only reason the U.S. went with uranium over thorium is because you need the enriched by-products of uranium reactors to create nuclear bombs, and the U.S. at the time was very interested in making such bombs. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern