Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

.......WTF.....




































3 titles will be released this year by Rare (wow, they are beginning to live up to their name, it's rare that you see a game) None of these games is PD:0, or Conker: Live and Uncut... talk about a microsoft money pit.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

Where did you hear this?

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

At least we all know Microsoft is making good use of Rare *sarcasm*

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

it's in the new GameInformer magazine, i recommend getting it, it's a huge issue.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

lol. Rare has issues. Microsoft has Rare. Microsoft has issues.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

Ugh... they should delay all of there other crap to come out AFTER PD:0

Oh well, my measuring stick for Rare is only Perfect Dark, I don't care if every other game they make is complete garbage. (Same goes for Bungie and Halo)

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

no Conker, PD in 2004?

F*CK

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

Anyone seen the new look for Conker? I dont like it.

RE: Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

That input matched my default category.
What don't you like about it?Try saying that with more or less context.
Can you tell me any gossip?
My brain contains 43347 categories, but not one that matches your last input.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

Are you sure that's how he will always look or is that just through that multi player mode?

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

He looks as gay as ever.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

http://ign64.ign.com/objects/002/002...?ui=gamefinder

Oh... he's not that gay ;)

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

Agreed...

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

of course you dont...

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

:hmm::confused:

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

i guess maybe if you dont like it your a fanboy? *shrugs*

:p

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

I dunno. I'm confused on his response.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

what were the chances that you were going to like one of Rare's characters that now belongs to MS instead of Nintendo? honestly?

for some reason your answer "I dont like it" didnt surprise me.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

could be that he just doesnt like it. :hmm:

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

of course it could be

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

I dont like the look of Conker. What's wrong with that? They made him too furry. He doesnt look similar to his '64 counterpart. blah blah blah, I know its the XBox now, but they made him too furry.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

So if Rare made Conker this same "too furry" look on the Nintendo GameCube you would feel the same way? Because you have to admit Rare was praised a lot around here when they were owned by Nintendo, and now that they are owned by Microsoft they are borderline hated.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

someone knows where I'm coming from

I'm not accusing you of anything, Jonbo...jumping to conclusions is a waste of time and effort...but I agree with Bond...I question your genuinity/sincerity due to possibly a clouded judgement

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

Well rare was alot bigger newer and fresher when they were with Nintendo. They havent had a game thats stood out since then. ecept Conker and PD:0 and those arnt out yet and they keep crapping out on dates witch is not good for there rep. and you cant call me a fanboy for ninteno and have it be true I hate my gamecube and regret buying the peice of crap.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

IMO, you guys are sounding just as clouded, opposite of what your saying about him.



You have to admit, there is a HUGE difference from thier nintendo days.

In thier nintendo days they made some of the best games on the console. They started going downhill at the end of the nintendo days. i cant help but think a lot of xbox fans didnt pick up on this because of the excitment of getting rare. But starfox sucked. and whatever game that was they released since... grabbed by the goulies? even worse. Many magazines have already pointed out when they showed conker that it looked like a snoozer and saying that kameo looks kinda :gay:
People started making mention of rares lack of quality when they were still with nintendo (except of course for the uber fans who would never say such :p )

Maybe the reason they're delaying these games is that they're working on making them a lot lot better, but untill i personally see another good one from them. i cant help but feel as they're losing it. it has nothing to do with nintendo.
I really hope they turn out some good ones. expecially one with the power of grabbing fans like PD.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

YES, I would feel the same way. Jesus, I'm not a flaming raging Nintendo fanboy.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

I used to be one of the biggest Rare fanboys around, needless to say I was quite crushed when they went to Microsoft. However, they've really done nothing this generation to prove that they were worth the hype. If they had released a new Banjo Kazooie or Perfect Dark by now, I'd sure as hell have an Xbox in my room at this moment. That day still may come. I may very well buy an Xbox just for the Rare games if they start being what they used to be. Otherwise, if they continue to stay in this lull, I'll thank them for the couple hundred bucks they saved me by not having to buy an Xbox.

PS: I think Conker looks OK. I sort of like the fur detail...It's in no way a surprise to me that his appearance has changed a bit, this is a big leap in terms of power from the Nintendo 64 after all...Plus, it's just character design, I'm not sure why anyone is really arguing about it. It's not as if anyone said that the game would suck, it's just the character design in some early art..

RE: Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

By now you do not do be one of the biggest Rare fanboys around needless to say he or she was quite crushed when they went to Microsoft anymore?You think they've really done nothing this generation to prove that they were worth the hype is superior to ALICE?Let's wait and see what they do."Who is the best robot" day still may come ?
Makes sense to me.Do you think your plan will succeed?In that case: Let's wait and see what they do.OK. Why? You think Conker looks is superior to ALICE?You are not the only one.

I'm not sure if I like the fur detail
.
What is it like?Are there any other ones someplace else?You're kidding.
character design he or she is not sure why anyone is really arguing about it is?It seemed like it was.
I've heard of it before.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

**** your gibberish.

RE: Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

Are you a student?

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

Yes, could you tell by my foul language?

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

lol. pwned :P

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

I remember the days when people here were salivating over one little funky screenshot of Kameo, and when people were saying Rare was Nintendo's answer for Square at the Sony camp... hmm, I've been going to these (and Nintendose/nintendodolphin.net) forums for 4 years now... hmm...

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

Yeah well that was in the period when we were playing Golden Eye, Banjo Kazooie and Perfect Dark. :rolleyes: Now look what we have: SFA and Grabbed by the Ghoulies....

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

A early generation game that was overhauled to put a Nintendo licened character in it and the first obviously rushed game Rare makes for Xbox... real fair comparison. That's about as valid as Square fans saying Squaresoft seemed to be losing there touch when Bouncer was released on Ps2.

I'd rather not jump to conclusions until Conker, Banjo, or (most importantly) Perfect Dark is released... until then I take all bitching about rare as people here being mad Rare left Nintendo.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

And i'll take some as ppl being mad, and some as ppl just seeing whats infront of them.
on the flip side i'll take some that refuse to see it as people clinging to a hope that ms didnt waste money on rare.

;) not that thats anyone here. just yanno. in general :p

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

I see what's in front of me just like the next guy... I didn't expect SFA or GBG to be any better than they were. I just find it funny that people bash them and say they a crap for games that weren't a part of what made rare good in the first place.

Hey... I'l admit... I'm a perfect dark fanboy. Until they burn me and make a crappy version of Perfect dark (or a crappy FPS in general) I will be clinging on to the fact that Rare hasn't shown there post sale potential yet. If rare was still with Nintendo I would think the same exact way (even though in that case they would have much less excuses for having GBG and SFA being there last two games).

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

i didnt say you. ;) hehe

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

I don't like the model either and I don't think there's anything biased in it. I personally would hate it the same if it was in the GC. And really, are you that impressed with what rare has done so far this generation? Rare hasn't really made me happy of owning one of their games since the late N64 days (Perfect Dark and Conker being the only two exceptions). I was hoping for the company to return to its roots of great gameplay mechanics and productivity but man, my patience isn't infite. Star Fox left a bad taste in me and the company takes foever and a day to make one game now. Not only that but Rare now kept only their name becuase most of their talent went away.I.e. they're pretty much an empty shell IMO. So who knows how the games might turn out to be? I am still expecting PD and Conker but this conker model (Suposing it is not a joke. And I think they changed Perfect Dark to cell shading which is really far from what the series began like) is really bringing my hopes even lower. If they don't really deliver with these games I might just forget about the existence of the company.

So this goes from waaaaay before the company was bought by Microsoft. Really, I think it's a cheap scapegoat to frame every one who dislikes rare stuff now as a fanboy. You better come up with something else.

Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
 

"Can't be a joke. Came straight from IGN"