![]() |
Nintendo Shows You how to Milk Correctly
Step one, get a hit series that sells on name alone
Step 2, release that series in anything possible Step 3, laugh as you walk to the Bank Step 4, repeat the lat two steps again... Anyhow... Quote:
http://cube.ign.com/articles/393/393563p1.html ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
aww man...i really wanted to know how to milk :baby:
anyhoo...that sounds pretty cool i guess...but since i'm not into pokemon that much anymore, i don't realy care much for it...but it sounds cool...and thats the main thing! :p |
WOW... That's REALLY milking the franchise.
Pokemon is a fad in Europe and America. In Japan on the other hand... it's a well respected franchise like Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest etc. This will sell quiet a lot for what it is. |
Is this some kind of joke? Give me a break, Nintendo. They hsouldn't be wasting their time with crap like this.
|
So you can just catalogue the Pokemon? There's nothing else new? No new monsters? No 3D animations? Nothing?
I wouldn't have bough it anyway, but it still sucks. If they actually released a Pokemon game (read: RPG) on the GCN, I might buy it. But nothing like this, even if it had Ruby & Sapphire on it. *shrugs and walks away* |
Yes, you guys can frown upon this, but this move might sell Gamecubes, although it would sell a whole lot more if they actually released a real Pokemon rpg on the Cube instead of d**king around.
|
Quote:
I mean it's cheap, it's effective, it makes use of the GBA/GCn connectivty which is something they are big on and it will push some systems not a lot, but some. And if anything, it's probably to make up for their thin line up in Japan atleast that is IMO. |
More PokeCrap? :mad:
|
Nintendo... Make a new Pokemon game exclusive to Gamecube, with 3D nice ass graphics and something similar to the GBA Pokemons. You want to sell more Gamecubes in Japan? That's all you have to do, not make a copy of this **** for the Cube... (I am not calling Sapphire or Ruby ****, I am calling Nintendo's stupid porting method ****...) damn!
And yes, I am not calling it a port from the GBA games, just a look alike... |
I'm tired of you guys' incessant bitching about Nintendo, milk this, screw that console, release this, continue that, whatever.
Can you see Nintendo relying on all-new franchises like Pikmin? How did Pikmin turn out? Like crap. Look at it this way. You're sitting in your office after a successful game was released, in this case, Zelda. Now, do you want to risk all your money on some new game, or go with something people are fimiliar with? Why isn't Bungie working on something else than Halo? Halo recieved good feedback. Why the hell is Konami still making Metal Gear Solid? Why is Polyphonic still making GT? Why is Rockstar still making GTA? Why is Rare still going to make Perfect Dark, Banjo Kazooie, or Conker? Let's put it this way. Nintendo's still in rehab since the losses of N64, and now, Gamecube. If you're a lemonade stand, and you've been making lemonade for a while, and people like it, and during Fall, your business is much slower than it used to be, are you going to start selling Ice Cream? So, what's this? This is the position Nintendo is in. They need to build back the respect they once had, and the only way to go up is to rely on stuff like Pokemon, because that sells no matter what season. Or, do you guys recommend they say "Ah, **** it!" And go create some new **** that might turn out like Pikmin? You make me sick. |
Well Dyne, there is a problem with milking, and Nintendo isn't the only company guilty of it, but even if they didn't milk PokeMon this is a friggin joke, I mean it's not even a legit game, it's basically a 3D tropy case for Pokefanatcis or something like that, I mean really what is the point of it? They could have given it away with the system or even PokeMon Ruby n Sapphire.
|
So, you really don't want to spend $20 some bucks on a storage system? It's like buying an e-reader for Animal Crossing. It enhances the experience. People want to get their money's worth...
|
The fact of the matter is that Nintendo is spending a lot of time MILKING the Pokemon franchise. They have been for quite a while, now. If they decide to use the Pokemon name and produce something NEW and FRESH and HIGH QUALITY, then I think everyone would be a little more appreciative. Pokemon Snap, Stadium 1/2, Ruby/Sapphire/Gold/Aqua/SuperMetallicOrange, etc.? Give me a break.
|
If it was the standard price of a Gamecube game, I'd be upset. I think this "game" is wasteful and it's endangering Pokémon's reputation. I don't need to organize my Pokémon on the Gamecube and reaarange Pokémon pieces, I'm probably GT's biggest Pokémon fan but not to that extent. I'm dissappointed, things like this are what cause the game to lose it's longest running fans.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern