WWF Raw vs WWF WrestleMania X-8
 

Well finally some dam information on the WWF game for GameCube.. Really can't do much since it's insider info but I will compare a pic of the two..at 50% since it would be pretty unfair to compare a pic of a near unfinished WrestleMania and a finished Raw



And since I can't link to the URL for the pic.. it's attached...

Don't care for the Rock much..But good thing he is popular..was easy to find two coparable pics

Raw looks Better IMO... for 2 reasons:

1) the animation of the rock bottom is ugly on the cube version

2) the Raw pic is more zoomed in

When is WWF Wrestlemainia going to be released for Gamecube?

IMO both Rock Botoms need work....
The one for X-Box is a little too neat for the Rock
The one for GC is a little too sloppy for the Rock

The GameCube ones better in my opinion...
1)A referee...
2)The crowd looks better....

The X-box version looks better....
1)Better character models
2)Much closer..or zoomed in

And like I said before the GC game is due out in the summer

1) Just because there is a Ref in the GCN shot doesn't mean there isn't one hidden in the X-Box shot

2) We can't even see the crowd in the Gamecube shot because of all the fog...

I will get a nice low res pic of Raw:





does the crowd look better in these pics just because they are foggy???

Hmm as far as I know Raw has no ref in it.....

Well the crowd looks better in WrestleMania..fog or no fog.. I mean I could careless about the crowd but eh....

And please tell me those pics are old..because that little bar at the bottom might get annoying...

Attitude (spirit) Meters take up the same amount (or More) of space... it's all a matter of getting used to it.

Attidue meter was divided... Attitude meter took up more room depending on the amount of people on screen.. for Raw it looks like it takes up the same amount for all of the game.. and I'm not nit-picking.. the game looks good and proabbly would be the only reason I pick up an X-Box....

I think that the Rock Bottom for WrestleMania X-8 looks alot better. It looks better becuase it is a bit loose, so-to-speak. I think that it adds for realism because not all moves are perfect.

As for the power meter's are concerned, I do not mind the meter's on XBox's Raw... It just needs a little getting used to. Same with the WCW vs. nWo games.

And to make a final judgement on the graphics at this half-way point in development, I would have to say that the GCN WWF looks better, but not by far. I like how the crowd looks, and the whole atmosphere. Plus, I hate the XBox logo in the rafters. *shudders*

Well the GC version has it beat in features so far... I mean ECW/WCW wrestlers plus Hell in a Cell.. sweet heavens



Well another comparison pic of the 2002 Royal Rumble winner HHH..The Game

The shot of HHH for RAW looks alot better than the shot of him on Wrestlemania. But I think that is because it is a close up. Also, are all of these in game shots? Because some of the views are pretty aukward (sp?)

Do you really want the best graphics? I mean, do you really want an acurate bulge?

And GC's dev kit takes ****ty shots. You should all know that by now.

I thought this would be the generation when the crowd actually looks like a crowd and not cardboard. :p

Both images look alright, but both of them need a lot of work also. In my own opinion WWF WrestleMania looks a tad better. But I think at 50% completion of both games it is just pure opinion.

Only in Hitz.

i havta say wrestlemania looks better. But not more realistic maybe.


See, xbox looks TOO realistic. the Character models look stiff. So far the Models in WM look more flexable. which is what the THQ games for N64 were always like.... Flexable.

makes for a faster paced more fun game.


have to wait and see if they actually end up being like that tho