![]() |
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Stonecutter disrespects the troops, and I never said a thing about Ranzid. He hates Bush and America, but to my knowledge he has never mentioned anything about the military.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Gekko, do you read other posts than yours? I don't "hate" America. It seems that to you, anybody that don't agree with what the US does, are anti-americans. Why don't you get your head out of your ass, and try to look at things from both sides. Like Stonecutter said, your just another warmonger. BTW aren't you gonna answer his last post? Oh that's right, you only reply to what you want to and ignore the rest right?
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Oh no, I'm not a flamer! :rolleyes:
You do hate America. You have criticized everything America does, from Afghanistan to Iraq to enviormental problems. You have never said one positive thing about the country, and all you do is complain how America is the cause of America's problems. You hate America, I hate you. Just accept it already. |
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
Either that or Ann Coultier can indite me for treason. And before someone else points this out, yes, I'd still hit that. |
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
Its like the whole Dixie Chicks debacle. Everyone is screaming about how their first amendment rights are being trampled because of boycotts. Ummm... NO. The first amendment only refers to government censorship. If groups of like-minded people or privately owned radio stations wish to boycott a group for their political views, they are excercising THEIR first amendments rights just as the Dixie Chicks did when criticizing the president. It is just as valid a political statement. To hail the Dixie Chicks for excercising their rights and then say they are being censored by those ezxcercising theirs is silly. Besides, the Dixie Chicks are a COUNTRY GROUP. They must be either inbred or retarded to criticize a texan president... What, they DIDN'T think people would react that way? Their fan base have gun racks and chew terbackee! |
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
No one was talking about calling someone unamerican, nor did they say that you couldn't call someone unamerican. My point was that just because you find fault in something, doesn't mean you hate it. I don't hate any country or any group of people, I hate individuals :) |
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
So has anyone seen what they did to Saddam's sons? They put putty and junk all over their faces to make them look more like they should. As if this isn't just screaming "We just killed 2 innocent men and tried to fool you into thinking it was your leaders!" (That's a lot to scream)
I'm beginning to think that the entire governmental body of the US is mentally retarted. Hmm... |
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
I believe they used wax, not putty.
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
|
I read that Saddam's sons tortured people and raped would-be brides the day of their marriage. Sounds like a couple of nice, innocent people there.
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
When I saw what they did to the bodies (well, the faces) I knew people would start conspiracy theories about how it's not really them :p That'd be funny if the government really did fake that it was them though... I bet Gekko and Bond would find any way they could to justify it... :sneaky: |
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
Be liberal, not ignorant. They're dead, this is like the "the us faked 9/11" or the "if gore would have won, 9/11 wouldn't have happened" arguements. It's stupid. |
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
Quote:
The U.S. is one of history's most benign superpowers if not the most benign, but it's still not philanthropic. There's always a certain amount of self-interest when we interfere. It might be to help our economy or it might be for some political gain. The fact is sending troops around is expensive. The government had better believe it's going to be worthwhile. The rampant human rights abuses going on in Iraq might have been a good enough reason for you to send troops (or in same cases send yourself) over, but it's not a good enough reason for the public in general. When the public hears the word "war" nowadays, they think about all the sons and daughters who are going to die rather than the good it might do. And the American people will always choose their own kids over Iraqi kids. |
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
|
Whoa, you guys got me all wrong. I didn't mean that they aren't dead. They probably are. What I was saying was that by putting wax or putty or whatever it was all over their faces it made it look like we went out and killed two innocent Iraqi people and tried to make it look like Saddam's sons. By doing that they made it easy for a bunch of Iraqi people to just say that we were lying all along. Before it was like "Well maybe they could be lying, who knows?" Now it just looks like we were lying and stuff and we were really trying to cover it up.
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
At first we showed the bodies as we found them, then we waxed them up to make them look more lifelike. Either way there will always be conspiracy theories in Iraq. That's how things operate.
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
I would just like to add that Saddam recently released another of his high-tech audiotapes in which he acknowledged the death of his sons, saying they were "martyred for Iraq" and also said America will be defeated.
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern