GameTavern

GameTavern (http://www.gametavern.net/forums/index.php)
-   Happy Hour (http://www.gametavern.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Dear Shooter: HAAAAAAA! (http://www.gametavern.net/forums/showthread.php?t=2221)

Mushlafa 06-11-2002 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joeiss


Hmmm... the definition of a really good team means one that all players contribute, and don't play bad games. I think that the fact that the Lakers capitalized on Kings' crapiness in game 7 makes them the better team. And how can you say that Kings are the better team if Lakers beat them?

I think eaven the lakers have their bad games ;) I think if both teams had decent games the kings woulda won :unsure:

Whatever... i think the kings are better than the lakers eaven if the lakers did beat them in a best of 7...

oh well

GameKinG 06-11-2002 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mushlafa


5 games ??
You mean 4 ;)

I still think the old bulls woulda killed today lakers.. well maybe not killed but beatin them. I also think that the kings are better than the lakers and the kings woulda won if they didnt have such a bad game... the only people who really played good that last game were Webber and Bibby .. the rest of them were shooting really crappy.

Oh hehe Erin williams set a new record for the fastest foul out... 6 fouls in 7 min... and new jersy was shooting 78% in the third :eek:

Well, todays lakers with shaq and kobe are better then Magic from a bit older lakers (no offense to magic who was a big thing before jordan). So if the older lakers almost beat the bulls for the title in 91, Im sure the new ones would have taken it all the way.

Mushlafa 06-11-2002 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GameKinG


Well, todays lakers with shaq and kobe are better then Magic from a bit older lakers (no offense to magic who was a big thing before jordan). So if the older lakers almost beat the bulls for the title in 91, Im sure the new ones would have taken it all the way.

I didnt feel like checking the players for the 91 bulls but i know in 91 they didnt have Toni Kukoc and they didnt have Dennis Rodman who averaged 15 RPG during the reg season. I also dont think that the lakers woulda won cause the lowest % shooting starter on the 95 bulls shot 44% which is really good...

Whatever... im just saying that the 91 bulls werent eaven close to as good as the 95-96 bulls

GameKinG 06-11-2002 10:15 PM

Well shaq is still currently ahead of jordans playoff shooting percentage, and then there is Kobe.

Mushlafa 06-11-2002 11:02 PM

Triple postin eh?
SO thats how you get all your posts

GameKinG 06-14-2002 07:30 PM

Nah, I didnt even notice that, I delete now.

Mushlafa 06-14-2002 07:46 PM

Well its over now.. the lakers swept them, but i wanna know what you guys think..

I think new jersy did a real good job cept game 1. They did a lot better than i thought they would, they kept it close every game except game one... and uhh... I knew Jason Kidd was a good passer but.. DAMN.. that guy makes the most impossible passes.

GameKinG 06-14-2002 09:28 PM

Yeah, hes a god passer. And Im glad shaq got Playoff MVP again, he deserved it.

Joeiss 06-14-2002 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GameKinG
Yeah, hes a god passer. And Im glad shaq got Playoff MVP again, he deserved it.
Yeah... Shaq played amazingly well. I liked how he said that the real MVP of the season was Jason Kidd, lol.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern