![]() |
Re: Iraq
Quote:
So... are you looking for this to turn into a debate or one of those cute topics where everyone states their own opinion? |
Re: Iraq
Bond....
I'm looking for people to read the article by Senator Kennedy, and to thoughtfullyy reply based on facts... I am looking for peoples assessments of the FACTS, I am NOT looking for peoples own opinions. |
Re: Iraq
Gekko isnt here....
Hehehe...I could start argueing about it, and he wouldnt be here to shove everything back down my throat. Meh...Ive danced this dance before. Im not going to get involved in this topic. Quote:
Im not going to diss your topic, its possible that you might get what you want, but I wouldnt bet on it. Edit: Opinions are like ass's...*nearly* everyone has one. |
Re: Iraq
Quote:
Quote:
But I will say "I told you so." Everything EVERYTHING that could have gone wrong, has gone wrong, and the current administration cannot afford to admit that they were wrong, and we're just going to fall deeper and deeper into this black hole that is swallowing american lives and american tax dollars with absolutly nothing to show for it. I cannot express how sick I feel when I think back at the 2000 election and realize that I actually supported Bush at the time. Bond, or Random, or Gekko (if he sees this) can feel free to rip me a new one, because I know I'm not going to change your minds, but for everyone who might still be trying to decide if the decision to go to war was a good one really should read this article. Sorry for rambling on like that, I really don't have any way to end this. |
Re: Iraq
Anyone who's not going to automaticly dismiss something with a slightly liberal stance would do well to read this article about the WMD situation and how the sanctions were actually doing their jobs.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/977254.asp?0dm=C1BQO |
Re: Iraq
Quote:
[edit] oh yeah and why I quoted that.. Murphy's law rox |
Re: Iraq
Quote:
We have not discovered that there were no weapons of mass destruction to begin with. Saddam did produce thousands of chemical and biological agents. The burden of proof was not on the United States to prove Saddam had those weapons. The burden of proof was on Saddam to prove that he destroyed those weapons. Saddam was also in violation of countless other U.N. mandates that don't even involve weapons of mass destruction. Just remember there are hundreds of bunkers under Iraq that are basically impenetrable to any conventional weapon. Now, a common misperception is that the majority of Iraqis are displeased. That is very untrue, the majority of Iraqis would much rather have a democracy than a totalitarian government. You simply see more of the angry Iraqis because the media feeds on bad things and likes to scare you. And the Taliban are in Afghanistan, not Iraq. I would write more, but time is limited. |
Re: Iraq
The mainstream thought here in Canada is that the Americans are being greedy and going for the oil, well, at least in the toronto area...dunno aboot BC and such
|
Re: Iraq
they should just let the soldiers come home already!!, and you know what the hell with bush as our president... he wants to give them sooooo much damn money and give them orders.... why the hell doesnt he just go over there and take the position as president.... god knows he would do a hell of alot better job over there then he has done for us... and i dont think they would argue... if they were to rebel against him, they could always shoot him, i dont think he would be as good of a hider as saddam is :P
|
Re: Iraq
I agree I back bush in the saddam thing but I think we should have assisinated him then moved in to take Iraq then put the Iraqi people in charge of their own lives :)
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern