yah and there have been some really dumb ones other than this, but this is just someone stating there opninion, im sure duffman doesnt nark on some of your retarded post that you have created in the past.

If you think America will loose in terms of being over-powered I think your mentaly insane. If your talking about loosing as in not acheiving their ultimate goal (take out sadam and reform Iraq) then I dunno...

Ah.... in the Gulf War, some Iraqi troops surrendered to CNN teams. Talk about low morale.

Well it's clear that according to our (The USA's) definition of wining, the USA Will win, but let's examine this further from both POV's...

The USA: If we disarm Iraq and kick the cr@p out of thier armies, we win, if they kick our arses, they win.

Iraq: If we Survive, we win.

Ok, the way the USA will win this war is simple, we're going in with the UK and Australia for troops. Germany, Japan, Canada and otherrs including Turkey and a few of Saddams other Arab enemy's ahve agreed to assist us in other ways, but not actually fight, we don't need an overf,lowof troops, too many cooks basiclly, ubut we will need suport for supplies and repairs and refugees.

Now the only way the USA will win this "war" with evryone sqatoiifsed, including Saddam (This isn't even a "real' war, no formal declaration was made, but for all intesne and purposes it's a war for this post), is to KILL Saddam Huessain.

I suggest those iof you can't stand the SOB look for an MP3 on a P2P network called "Lets Bomb Iraq", it's oneof those 'Bin lqaden Boat SOng' stuyle parodies, but Saddam hyas had 12 years, most poeple would be given 5 at most, ther exceptionis thed ISreal./palitsine confglict which is being done pretty well, Iraq has not repsoneed tot he UN, which was founed ot stop dictaors like Saddam beofre they got the pwoer Hitler had, it was founded after WW2 soleleyfor thatr eason at first, now we nee dto have the UN do their job, Saddam has to go and Kim Jon Il is next.