![]() |
Re: The Apple iPad
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The Apple iPad
For all of its limitations this thing is more functional than most netbooks. Particularly when you see the productivity apps available for it and consider the hardware inside.
The iWork suite has been split into three apps, Pages (Word Processor), Numbers (Spreadsheets), and Keynote (Interactive Presentations). Each of them have gotten a multitouch rewrite that actually look more functional than their desktop counterparts. $10 apiece, down from the $99 Mac OS suite. The only reason the hardware is so cheap (and relatively, it's dirt cheap) is because Apple is manufacturing all of the components themselves. They bought a chip manufacturing plant and designed their own mobile processor, A4 as they've dubbed it. They designed the battery. They designed the OS. It's insanely snappy, has an incredible library of apps already available, and has the iTunes store in your pocket on a 10" LED IPS screen. Also, I can see the iPad exploding in various businesses. But none moreso than the medical industry. This is the tablet that they've been waiting for. It has the speed they need, the display they need, an SDK so they can develop the apps that they need, and more importantly, it's reasonably priced. I really don't think this is going to be a flop. It's just going to take a little time for us to really figure out everything we can do with this device. |
Re: The Apple iPad
Quote:
This thing will definitely not be a flop - I've already heard a ton of people in classes and at work talking about how much they want one. |
Re: The Apple iPad
Quote:
Now that so mention it, it makes perfect sense for medical uses. My family doctor already uses a kind of tablet to check info and to write and print prescriptions. |
Re: The Apple iPad
Quote:
Even if I had an iPad, I would always have an iPad + iPhone, since it can't make calls (and I wouldn't want to hold it to my ear). So any minor stuff I need to do, like check a calendar, I would still do on my phone. If I have business to do, I'll need a laptop since the iPad wouldn't allow me to do any work. |
Re: The Apple iPad
I don't see myself ever wanting to use this, even if it gets more applications added to it in the future. I really have no desire to have any screen being touched by my fingers either. Steve Jobs actually said that, everyone has a laptop and a smart phone these days. I JUST got my laptop on Tuesday, and I don't have a stupid smart phone. I don't want to live my life on my phone like most people do who have them. Also, whoever gets this iPad isn't going to use it for its full potential. It'll just become another device to go on facebook with, or whatever applications most people use these days. I know that this doesn't apply to everyone, but you can't disagree that a lot of people get this new stuff just because it's new and looks shiny and allows them to do the same few things they do on their computers anyway.
|
Re: The Apple iPad
|
Re: The Apple iPad
Quote:
And like I said, I can't imagine anyone carrying this around with them outside their home, other than on road trips or flights, so no real need to even mention it's calling capabilities. The only thing I consider "bad" out of all the things I've heard about it is the battery life. 10 hours in "optimal"...so average will probably be a lot less than that. Not bad for use around your house, but if you were on a long trip or something that would be annoying. |
Re: The Apple iPad
Quote:
Still think the only product apple has made so far that I still consider a good investment is the iPod. So much time spent with music, and my 30 GB video iPod is still rolling along. iPod is so tasty. :D My thoughts about iPad: It will be hella useful for so many jobs. Those uber douche types will buy it because it's from apple. I really expected some serious innovation from Apple. Hate them as I might, they're always the first to make new things, and then other companies improve those things for me later. Giant iPod touch/iPhone. I actually don't understand why this wasn't created a year or 2 ago bar from the fact that the internal parts might have been quite a bit behind. I remember one day being like "Lol, probably should just make this iPhone 10x bigger and sell that shit to people" Tah dunh! They're doing it now. Also Lack of Flash = Lack of pretty much the internet anyway. |
Re: The Apple iPad
No, 10 hours is realistic for basic music listening and whatnot. Particularly if you're not constantly using your wifi/3g. For what it does it actually has really good battery life. Namely because Apple built both the battery and the super efficient A4 processor that they put in it.
|
Re: The Apple iPad
Quote:
Let's pay all this money for technology that we *may* get some free apps for someday. :retard: It's honestly like licensing hardware, which BELIEVE ME, is a bad idea. |
Re: The Apple iPad
Again. I think you can make calls via VoIP with a bluetooth headset. But regarding the Flash and calling issues, I think that'll be corrected soon. Adobe is a little pissed they haven't been included yet, however, the only phone I've seen with Flash has been the Pre, and it's not released yet, and it SUCKS. I think Apple is waiting till the technology is a little more refined.
Even still, this is a GREAT read. Really captures my point of view that while this iPad may not be for you, the iPad is the first step towards a lot of potential. http://www.stephenfry.com/2010/01/28/ipad-about/ |
Re: The Apple iPad
This thread needs more pictures. I've yet to see this 'iPad'.
Also, I don't get it. I've had a Sony iPad for ages! ![]() http://img352.yfrog.com/i/478z.jpg/ |
Re: The Apple iPad
Flash isn't on iPad for the same reason it isn't on the iPhone.
The single leading source of application crashes on Mac OS X is Flash - a component that Apple can’t fix. And ignoring crashes, it takes a much more powerful Mac to play HD flash videos than on a PC - all because of Adobe's bad programming. Flash has widereaching capabilities, and would have to be able to access the memory of any app in order to display something in them. Imagine if your favorite apps were suddenly slower and crashed more often just because Apple introduced a poorly written implementation of Flash. It doesn't make sense. Adobe needs to get their stuff together and prove that they can develop a version of Flash that Apple is willing to use. Edit: According to Tom's Hardware, the iPad can handle 10 hours of HD video without a recharge. |
Re: The Apple iPad
![]() ![]() ![]() And that sums up my thoughts. Also, reading on a computer is a bitch on the eyes. This won't be the Kindle killer unless it comes with a lifetime supply of free Aspirin. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern