![]() |
Re: Over/Under: Led Zeppelin
Quote:
|
Re: Over/Under: Led Zeppelin
Great band or a bunch of thieves?
Not taking sides here, but there is evidence there. http://www.cracked.com/article_18500...-bastards.html |
Re: Over/Under: Led Zeppelin
Quote:
Led Zeppelin 1 (1969): -2X Platinum in UK. 6th on UK charts -1 on Spain Charts. -10th on US, 11th in Canada Led Zeppelin 2 (1969): -4X Platinum in UK. 1 in UK charts. - 1 in AUS, CAN, US, GER, SPN charts. - 2nd in NOR. Led Zeppelin 3 (1970): -1 in UK, US, CAN 3rd in GER, FRA, NLD Led Zeppelin 4 (1971): -1 in UK, CAN -2nd in US, FRA, JPN -3rd in NOR Houses of the Holy (1973): -1 in UK, AUS, CAN, US -3rd in FRA, JPN, -4th in NLD, NOR Physical Graffiti (1974) -1 in UK, US, CAN -2nd in AUS, AUT, SPN Presence (1976) -1 in UK, US In through the Out Door (1979) -1 in UK, CAN, NZ, US Coda (1982) -This album was horrible |
Re: Over/Under: Led Zeppelin
You'll notice that they mostly sold in the UK. Not so much in the other EU countries, although there are some exceptions.
But does your list mean that Led Zeppelin is in Europe regarded as "one of, if not the best band of all time with ridiculous staying power"? I hardly doubt it. Also, if what you say is true, then why are we having this thread? How could they be underrated if they're thought of as (one of) the best band(s)? Then they'd clearly be overrated and we wouldn't need to have this discussion. |
Re: Over/Under: Led Zeppelin
Quote:
As for why this thread exists, I actually have no idea. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Over/Under: Led Zeppelin
Quote:
|
Re: Over/Under: Led Zeppelin
Yeah well, I just want to get the point across that they're not regarded as one of the best bands everywhere in the world... Perhaps in the English speaking countries.
So... overrated in the US and UK, underrated in the rest of the world? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern