Log in

View Full Version : Is it racism?


Dylflon
04-13-2004, 12:21 AM
I was playing a game online and this guy was harassing me for 45 minutes because I was Canadian. He'd yell at me for every typo or anything I did or said. He called me all sorts of names and used canadian stereotypes against me.

Now, I couldn't care less because obviously this guy is a retard. But I told him he was being racist and he called me a homo and said canadians aren't a race so it can't be racism.
But I don't think that actually matters. I still find it to be racist.

Do you guys think it's racism or not?

Typhoid
04-13-2004, 12:27 AM
Its not racism unless hes black....Somehow they cant be the same race as you. It should be something else like "Stereotypeism" or "Im a fu**ing retardism". You should have not payed attentiont to him. Or started to make Country slurs about him. It cant be Racism because Racism has to do with the colour of your skin, not your Nationality. I say we all act american and Go Drive-By shoot him......j/k :sneaky:





What a F***ing moron

Dylflon
04-13-2004, 12:29 AM
Its not racism unless hes black....Somehow they cant be the same race as you. It should be something else like "Stereotypeism" or "Im a fu**ing retardism". You should have not payed attentiont to him. Or started to make Country slurs about him. It cant be Racism because Racism has to do with the colour of your skin, not your Nationality. I say we all act american and Go Drive-By shoot him......j/k :sneaky:





What a F***ing moron

I don't believe racism is just the color of your skin. Like...I'm white...and if I call a British person a Limey, that's still considered a racist remark.

Typhoid
04-13-2004, 12:30 AM
I don't believe racism is just the color of your skin. Like...I'm white...and if I call a British person a Limey, that's still considered a racist remark.

make a poll.........with the same name.....let the others decide....

The Germanator
04-13-2004, 12:31 AM
rac·ism
n.

1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

No, it isn't racism. It's silly to make fun of Canada, but not all Canadians are of the same race, so it can't be classified as racism. Stupidy? Sure. Other than that, don't know what else to say.

Typhoid
04-13-2004, 12:32 AM
Thank you for looking it up in the dictionary.....saved me the time....lol....its just prejudice or something...Or maybe....just maybe hes an asshole.

Jonbo298
04-13-2004, 12:35 AM
An asshole and a major ass.

The Germanator
04-13-2004, 12:35 AM
I don't believe racism is just the color of your skin. Like...I'm white...and if I call a British person a Limey, that's still considered a racist remark.

No, I don't believe that is a racist remark. Some people may be offended by it, but that doesn't mean that it is racist. Again, like calling a French person a frog....It's a disparaging term, but since it contains no insult directly against a race, that isn't racist...

Hero2
04-13-2004, 12:49 AM
rac·ism
n.

1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

No, it isn't racism. It's silly to make fun of Canada, but not all Canadians are of the same race, so it can't be classified as racism. Stupidy? Sure. Other than that, don't know what else to say.
race

a : an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a species; also : a taxonomic category (as a subspecies) representing such a group
b : BREED
c : a division of mankind possessing traits that are transmissible by descent and sufficient to characterize it as a distinct human type

race dosent have to do with the color of your skin but what group you fall into. since he was putting you into a group and making fun or insulting you because your in that group. yes it was racist to say that stuff.

Typhoid
04-13-2004, 12:55 AM
Make a god dam poll...and no it wasnt racism....ask someone what the first thing that pops into their head is when you say race. They'll usually say something along the lines of the colour of your skin. What this guy did was more of slandering Canada, not racism. But for the slandering of Canada he must pay... :flame: <----No one uses that

The Germanator
04-13-2004, 01:05 AM
race

a : an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a species; also : a taxonomic category (as a subspecies) representing such a group
b : BREED
c : a division of mankind possessing traits that are transmissible by descent and sufficient to characterize it as a distinct human type

race dosent have to do with the color of your skin but what group you fall into. since he was putting you into a group and making fun or insulting you because your in that group. yes it was racist to say that stuff.

I disagree still. Look at definition three. "A division of mankind possesing traits that are transmissible by descent and sufficient to characterize a distinct human type." This is to say that someone is of Asian descent, African-American descent, Caucasian descent, Native American descent, etc. Can someone be of Candian descent? Sure, but how people see you is based off of preliminary descent. If your parents are from Japan, and you are born and raised in Canada, what are you? Candian, right? Well, what do you put down on your college application for race? Asian...There is a difference between nationality and race. Again, a race just isn't a "group" as you say...I see that you play FFXI. Let's say I hate FFXI and everyone that plays it for unjust reasons...Is that racist of me? No, it's just an unjust classification...

Hero2
04-13-2004, 05:14 AM
point taken I would still call it racism though. just because I have nothing else to call it. except "Im a fu**ing retardism" like typhoid said.

Canyarion
04-13-2004, 05:36 AM
You mean discrimination. Just like when they make fun of me because I'm a witness of Jehova. :unsure:

Professor S
04-13-2004, 10:17 AM
The fact that it is even a question of whether or not anti-CANADIAN remarks are RACIST shows how the Politically Correct Gestapo have gotten completely out of control.

Insults to Canadians, Americans, Brits based on NATIONALITY are NATIONALIST, not RACIST.

If he were to call you a Canadian honkey, then you may have a point, but making fun of the way you pronounce the letter "O" does not make anyone a racist.

TheGame
04-13-2004, 12:42 PM
Race is an illusion. It's a tool that people use to classify others and themselves that is 100% subjective. There is no way to define a "black" person or a "white" person, because no matter how you do it you will always find someone who fits the bill 100% and who woudn't call themselves what you label them as. (unless you include nationality in your definition of what makes them black or white, and the nationality would be Ameri... err, from US)

Professor S
04-13-2004, 03:18 PM
The sad fact is that racism in some shape or form will always exist as it is a natural function of our brains. Before you start yelling, hear me out.

Your brain cannot possibly categorize every person you meet or see in life individually. The brain simply cannot handle such a load. Therefore you brain must do something called Social Stereotyping. This allows you to handle the fact that there are 6 billion people in the world that are not the same by breaking them down into categories determined by looks, social status or both.

You cannot stop this, as much as you cannot stop you Fight or Flight response or your urge to remove your hand from a hot burner. It is natural.

What we have to start to do is realize that this happens and understand how to use it in a benign fashion for acceptance rather than fear and xenophobia. Ignoring racism/social stereotyping or dismissing it altogether does more harm than good.

Men and women are different, blacks and whites are different and so on and so forth. We should accept and embrace these differences if we are ever going to stop malevolent racism.

Perfect Stu
04-13-2004, 04:25 PM
I wouldn't consider myself a racist, but here me out.

I was in a school with a HUGE percentage of oriental kids. Now, the fact of the matter is, most of them are just different kinda people. Not my kinda people. For whatever reason, I just dont get along with most oriental kids...and I SEVERELY doubt it has to do with what they look like...because I have a few oriental friends that I love.

But you really have to be careful what you say these days...I've actually been in trouble for RETALIATING on a racist remark with another. My peers found it humorous, but I really shouldn't have said it. I wasn't allowed to join this game of soccer because I was not Chinese, Korean, or Japanese. They asked me what the hell I was doing there. I said, "to play soccer...why are you here? oh I know...the free welfare".

Completely heat of the moment...

TheGame
04-13-2004, 04:37 PM
...blacks and whites are different....

Funny you say that after my post...

I understand what you mean by social steriotyping, but it kind of defeats the purpose when our own government classifies us by race, and we classify ourselves by race.

You say blacks and whites are different, explain how this is true in an objective way without brining nationality into it.

That's why I say Race is an illusion... ask a Dark skined man in South America if he is black, and he will tell you no. Why? Because US's concept of "race" is screwed. I think the reason it may be used more here is because our country doesn't even have a name. Most other countries classify people more by where they are from instead of what the color of there skin is.

It's even got to the point where race is more defined by backround than the skin color. I mean, you are a wrestling fan, what "race" is The Rock? What is Hogan? Who has darker skin?

http://www.canoe.com/WrestlingImagesH/hogan_wrestlemania2002.jpg

;)

TheGame
04-13-2004, 04:42 PM
I wasn't allowed to join this game of soccer because I was not Chinese, Korean, or Japanese. They asked me what the hell I was doing there. I said, "to play soccer...why are you here? oh I know...the free welfare".

That's pretty bad Stu...saying things like that could get you killed out here lol.

[I bolded the nationalities... so, is this racism or nationalism? (On either side of the conflict)]

bobcat
04-13-2004, 06:09 PM
I've been called "wog" many times. This is like a negative term against half euro/aussies.

Now I've just learned to live with it (not that I get called that much) and I even sometimes call myself a wog. Instead of taking offence, I just leave it and don't care. You'd be suprised how well it works.

Unless it's more personal or directed at me in front of a huge crowd, then I'll retaliate properly, but in general I don't care

Seth
04-13-2004, 07:19 PM
I agree with GameMaster.


And..i get pestered all the time on the internet for being a Canadian. Doesn't really bother me. It's usually just poking fun. But ya, if the guy was going overboard about it...can get annoying just for the fact that he's disrupting your game.

Typhoid
04-13-2004, 08:31 PM
If someone says something aboot me being Canadian, i play along eh. make 'em think we all live in igloos and whatnot. And i think that the world is WAAAAAY to P.C.(pol. Correct) these days. Last week in class, i got in trouble for calling a kid "Black" my teacher said he ws "African American"...wait a minute here...we are canadain....So shouldnt he be "African Canadian"? whats wrong with saying the word black? i can call Caucasian people white. I can call oriental people Asian. So why cant i call an "African American" black? I know why, its the Pu**yfication of the world. And i dont want to be mean or rude but the U.S. (i have nothing wrong with the country) is dulling everything down to be less harsh on kids. in the early 20's the Traumatic syndrome caused in war was called " Shell Shock" simple and to the point. Now its call "Post-Traumatic war syndrome"...a little longer and harder to decipher what it means.... I just have a problem with double standards and how the world is getting so pollitically correct nowadays.

Dylflon
04-13-2004, 08:39 PM
I wasn't so much bothered by waht the guy said to me. I just found it racist and was wondering whether or not it was. You guys are bringing up very interesting points. Especially TheGame and The Strangler.



Carry on.

TheGame
04-14-2004, 12:09 PM
If someone says something aboot me being Canadian, i play along eh. make 'em think we all live in igloos and whatnot. And i think that the world is WAAAAAY to P.C.(pol. Correct) these days. Last week in class, i got in trouble for calling a kid "Black" my teacher said he ws "African American"...wait a minute here...we are canadain....So shouldnt he be "African Canadian"? whats wrong with saying the word black? i can call Caucasian people white. I can call oriental people Asian. So why cant i call an "African American" black? I know why, its the Pu**yfication of the world. And i dont want to be mean or rude but the U.S. (i have nothing wrong with the country) is dulling everything down to be less harsh on kids. in the early 20's the Traumatic syndrome caused in war was called " Shell Shock" simple and to the point. Now its call "Post-Traumatic war syndrome"...a little longer and harder to decipher what it means.... I just have a problem with double standards and how the world is getting so pollitically correct nowadays.

I don't consider myself either African American or Black... but I'd much rather a person call me black because I'm not from africa nor do I ever want to go there, I'm from New Bab*cough* the country with no name that's between Canada and Mexico. You have to remember Canada is a part of America too.

To me the only "mix" names that make sense are canadian-american or mexican-american.

Professor S
04-14-2004, 01:41 PM
You say blacks and whites are different, explain how this is true in an objective way without brining nationality into it.


Easy:

1) Wider nostrils and noses in general
2) Larger lips in general
3) Kinky dry hair as oppososed to the straighter, more oily hair of caucasians
4) Perma-tan
5) Smaller ears in general

Now these differences have absolutely nothing to do with who someone is, they have everything to do with what they look like. This is what social stereotyping mainly operates on. Now the social aspect comes in when you see differences in black and white american culture which is then associated with the physical differences.

By the way, this is not just a black and white issue, there are physical differnces between almost every race. Example: Can you tell someone is of Irish decent just by looking at them? I can. I even had a Jamaican I worked with guess that I was Scot-Irish and German the day we first met.

mickydaniels
04-14-2004, 02:13 PM
By the way, this is not just a black and white issue, there are physical differnces between almost every race. Example: Can you tell someone is of Irish decent just by looking at them? I can. I even had a Jamaican I worked with guess that I was Scot-Irish and German the day we first met.

Well around here, there are all kinds of Blacks that live in Brooklyn from all over and I, along with many others who've spent a good amount of time living here, can tell with great accuracy the difference between a Haitian, Jamaican, Trinidadian, etc.

TheGame
04-14-2004, 02:24 PM
By the way, this is not just a black and white issue, there are physical differnces between almost every race. Example: Can you tell someone is of Irish decent just by looking at them? I can. I even had a Jamaican I worked with guess that I was Scot-Irish and German the day we first met.

Err... what makes a person Jamican or Irish? Apparently you feel it's somthig different than what makes a person Canadian or British because you said:

"Insults to Canadians, Americans, Brits based on NATIONALITY are NATIONALIST, not RACIST."

The difference between race in NA and the rest of the world is that we don't base it off of nationality... we base it off of the way a person looks and the way they talk.

Like I said before:

"Race is an illusion. It's a tool that people use to classify others and themselves that is 100% subjective. There is no way to define a "black" person or a "white" person, because no matter how you do it you will always find someone who fits the bill 100% and who woudn't call themselves what you label them as. (unless you include nationality in your definition of what makes them black or white, and the nationality would be Ameri... err, from US)"

Because I'm raised in US I'm black, if I was raised in Jamaca I'd be Jamacain, if I was raised in Africa I'd be African.

Canyarion
04-14-2004, 03:31 PM
I think we all have the best intentions here, so try not to pinpoint people on the details they said.
We're all one big family. :)

Professor S
04-14-2004, 06:11 PM
Err... what makes a person Jamican or Irish? Apparently you feel it's somthig different than what makes a person Canadian or British because you said:

"Insults to Canadians, Americans, Brits based on NATIONALITY are NATIONALIST, not RACIST."

The difference between race in NA and the rest of the world is that we don't base it off of nationality... we base it off of the way a person looks and the way they talk.

You also are forgetting that in many other countries they are of one race for the most part, and that America is an melting polt of all those who moved from those ethnocentric countries that had thousands of years to develop their own physical attributes. We are all americans, a nation not even 225 years old yet, and we are separated into black and white because we are a country created by many races over a very short period of time.

Race is NOT an illusion, it is scientific fact backed up by just about every scientific book you can imagine. If other nations were to have the same kind of racial integration then you would see all kinds of problems there as well. Look at Germany. Jews are a race and were persecuted for being of their race, not their nationality. Jews don't believe they even have a nationality.

[/quote]Because I'm raised in US I'm black, if I was raised in Jamaca I'd be Jamacain, if I was raised in Africa I'd be African.[/QUOTE]

When you're ancestors where in Africa they were considered black and inferior when they were purchased by the white slavers. They were not just considered African. The slavers saw the physical and cultural differences and made judgements based on them. Do you really think that if the same people who lived in Africa looked exactly like the white slavers, there would have been slavery? I highly doubt it.

I also think you are putting far too much on semantics. The word "black" is used because its simply shorter and easier to say. Just as "white" is easier to say than European American.

TheGame
04-14-2004, 06:39 PM
You also are forgetting that in many other countries they are of one race for the most part, and that America is an melting polt of all those who moved from those ethnocentric countries that had thousands of years to develop their own physical attributes. We are all americans, a nation not even 225 years old yet, and we are separated into black and white because we are a country created by many races over a very short period of time.

I'm not forgetting it, I'm well aware of that.

Race is NOT an illusion, it is scientific fact backed up by just about every scientific book you can imagine. If other nations were to have the same kind of racial integration then you would see all kinds of problems there as well. Look at Germany. Jews are a race and were persecuted for being of their race, not their nationality. Jews don't believe they even have a nationality.

Ok, where does the term "Jew" come from? lol... just think about it.

When you're ancestors where in Africa they were considered black and inferior when they were purchased by the white slavers. They were not just considered African. The slavers saw the physical and cultural differences and made judgements based on them. Do you really think that if the same people who lived in Africa looked exactly like the white slavers, there would have been slavery? I highly doubt it.

I think you should take an african american history course before jumping to such conclusions.

First of all, when people from africa came in first contact with people from england they were not considerd black, that was a term created in america... and they were also not seen as inferior.

The first africans to come to america weren't even slaves, they were indentured servants (because it was against the law to have born again christians as slaves at the time). And at the the time there was slavery, both in africa and in america... white people were slaves here, and black people were slaves there. I don't want to take you through a whole history lesson on it... but when I return I will if I must, I suggest you read more into the subject.

Bond
04-14-2004, 06:39 PM
We're all the same in God's eyes. :)

Typhoid
04-14-2004, 06:55 PM
Race is the colour of your skin, thats just what it generally means. If your sayin that your not Jamacain because your not from Jamaca...Your right, but that has to do with nationality, not race. Im white, and if i ws born i Jamaca, i would be Jamacain. There is nothing that says you have to be black to be from a certain country, or white for another. I've watched the news sometimes, and i remember this one that said "An African American man"...blah blah blah....But like i said...What makes him African, or American,....were Canada......But Race is Skin, Nationality is the country you were born in, or raised for the majority of your childhood in.

Professor S
04-14-2004, 07:17 PM
You have to remember that Canada and America are colonies. This is a big difference from the national boundaries set forth by those in Europe and Asia. Tribal lines became national lines which is a reason why many nations tend to be ethnocentric in those areas. There race and nationality tend to have a connection.

Dylflon
04-14-2004, 07:24 PM
Look at Germany. Jews are a race and were persecuted for being of their race, not their nationality. Jews don't believe they even have a nationality.

Not that I'm arguing with your argument, I jsut want to clear up the thing about Jewish people in Germany.

The German Jewish people were not killed because they were Jewish. They were killed as a sick and twisted revenge plot.

Here's how the story goes:

During the later part of World War I Britain and Germany were considering calling the whole war a tie and letting their troops go home. But the more powerful Jewish-Germans had convinced the other powers of Germany to continue the war. They said that they would win for sure. As we all know, Germany lost the first world war. When the Treay of Versailles came about, Germany was left bankrupt. Germany went into a depression.

Hitler was still bothered by the treaty and blamed the Jews that told them to keep the war going for Germany's economic status. So Hitler and his regime started putting the Jewish people to work in forced labour programs. But it evetually got really out of hand and they started killing the Jews and these labour camps became death camps.

So, the Jews werren't persecuted for being Jewish per se. Hitler was sore and took it out on the the German-Jews.

Typhoid
04-14-2004, 07:28 PM
Hitler was commiting Genecide (the act of trying to obliterate a single race from the planet) He (Hitler) believed in the perfect race ( i forget the name) He didnt like the jews, and would have killed the Asians and blacks, but the jews were so much closer and didnt have a country, they wre interspersed to other country's, so they didnt have a military.

Professor S
04-15-2004, 10:49 AM
Hitler's mindset was purely race based. He believed in the myth of the superiority of not just the white race, but the blonde haired blue eyed arian race. This ideal of racial purity superceded even religion, and essentially National Socialism became about self-worship.

Hitler believed that the Jews were responsible for the plight of his racially impure country, they were not just a scapegoat for a failed Germany that was persecuted after WWI. All accounts of those who knew Hitler during this time back this up.

Also, even in the hypothetical chance if the jews were a scapegoat for WWI, they were still a race that was targeted to be a scapegoat because of the intense anti-semitism that was prevalent at that time. So in the end, it was still all about race.

In fact anti-semitism is currently running rampant in Europe and has been for a while now, especially in Spain.

Typhoid
04-15-2004, 09:30 PM
The strangler...pretty much what you said, has been said in the last 5 posts....

Professor S
04-16-2004, 10:48 AM
The strangler...pretty much what you said, has been said in the last 5 posts....

I'm reiterating that it WAS about race and that race does exist and is not some sort of nationalistic fallacy. I wasn't arguing with Dyflon to begin with... at least not in this thread. :)

GT News
04-16-2004, 10:48 AM
The strangler...pretty much what you said, has been said in the last 5 posts....

I'm reiterating that it WAS about race and that race does exist and is not some sort of nationalistic fallacy. I wasn't arguing with Dyflon to begin with... at least not in this thread. :)

Do you mean your name is reiterating that it WAS about race and that race does exist and is not some sort of nationalistic fallacy.
Perhaps I misunderstood. What were you?Where then?I am so glad you find this amusing, .

Jewels
04-16-2004, 01:53 PM
id just say discrimination, your a girl right and he was a guy? either way he was just a ****ing retard

GameKinG
04-16-2004, 01:58 PM
Its prejudice.

Dylflon
04-16-2004, 05:59 PM
id just say discrimination, your a girl right and he was a guy? either way he was just a ****ing retard

Did you just call me a girl? :(

Typhoid
04-16-2004, 06:48 PM
Did you just call me a girl? :(

Pwned