The sick freaks

[Trowser]

Some idiots at Ganons Tower are discussing garbage with me saying that homosexuality is OK.There is nothing wrong with it.Can you believe the morons?The thread is here

http://www.ganonstower.com/forums/showthread.php?s=postid=98753

Those guys are sick.Do you think gayness is wrong?

[Joeiss]

Homosexuality is fine by me, just as long as I do not see them in the act.

[Bond]

I could care less... we all die the same.

[nWoCHRISnWo]

There IS something wrong with it, and it IS wrong.

[DeathsHand]

Originally posted by nWoCHRISnWo
There IS something wrong with it, and it IS wrong.

No, there's something wrong with you, cuz you seem to hate everything ;)

But basically I see it like what Joeiss said :p

[PureEvil]

I don't really care. I make lots and lots of jokes and stuff insulting gay people, but I don't especially care one way or the other.

If people being homosexual actually bothers you, you have a problem. As long as they aren't trying to push their gay ways on you, who cares?

What I don't like is when I see pictures in the paper and stuff of gay people kissing and things like that. Seldom are there pictures in the media of straight people kissing, but the gays seem to get special privileges. Gay pride day is another stupid thing. I don't recall hearing of any heterosexual pride day, yet the gays get one.

So, I guess... I don't really have a problem with homosexuality in itself, as long as it's staying away from my ass, but rather with all the weird perks gay people get for being gay.

They want to be labelled as normal, yet insist on having stupid things like parades which segregate them from everyone else. They should just shut up and keep their gay tendencies to themselves.

[Shadow_Link]

God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve...

Just think about it, if everyone in the world was a homosexual, there would be no future generations, hence no future.

It just isn't natural :-o.

Am I homophobic... No, because I don't have a 'fear' of gay people. I mean, how can anyone be 'scared' of poofs? :p

[GameKinG]

I agree on the gay pride thing. I dont care if they choose to be homosexual, but they dont have to flaunt it anymore then the straight people do. I can imagine they would be mad if there was a heterosexual pride parade. Just like if there was a WET as apposed to BET.

[Joeiss]

Minorities always get what they went, well, except in the slave days. ;)


To elaborate on what GameKinG said, there isn't any White History Month, oh no! Because that would be racist.

There isn't any Men's Sports Channell, because that would be sexist.

Minorities just get what they want, in the mainstream media and such.

[Bond]

Originally posted by Joeiss
To elaborate on what GameKinG said, there isn't any White History Month, oh no! Because that would be racist.
There is no White History Month because every month is White History Month, ever think of it that way? I know where you are coming from though.

Also, if you aren't going to say it's natural. Then I ask you what is natural?

[Jason1]

I dont have a problem with gays. Like some of you said, just as long as it dosent interfere with my life, no problemo.

[BlueFire]

I just don't care for them. Let them be who or what they want. :p I agree it isn't natural. It's sick when it comes to a certain degree :unsure:

But I have nothing against gays. They are okay, me thinks, if they keep their gay tendencies, like pure evil said, to themselves.

And then, sometimes, Gay People confuse me. They don't want to be that way, yet they show pride and love to their minority. :confused:

[Stonecutter]

This is coming from a straight male.

When the **** did this forum become 1950's alabama?

Even if you want to be the most ignorant, thick headed person you can still think of it in a positive light.

here

Heterosexual Couple. 1 man, 1 woman.
0 sum on the dating pool.

Homosexual couple, 2 men (for the purpose of this demonstration, i'm just going to use men, because I'm sure most men are hypocritical and have absolutely no problem with lesbians)

-2 sum on your end of the dating pool.
That's two less guys trying to date that girl in 3rd period.

So there, without even brining logic into the picture, Homosexual males=Win for heterosexual Males.



Now, looking at this with a tiny bit of logic ask yourself a few questions.

1) If you have a significant other, don't you care for that person very much? Doesn't this person care for you very much as well? Don't you enjoy this experience? It is something very special. Consider gays, they enjoy this very same thing with their partners. Why should they be deprived of this, it is a very wonderful thing.

2) Why do you believe this is wrong? Is it because of religion? If so, why can't you make your own decisions? These people (gays) have absolutely no effect on your lives if you are not gay unless you allow them to. Are you afraid that you might have some sort of attraction to the same sex? If so why? Simply being attracted to a person of your own sex does not make you gay.

Most of the responses against gays are that "Its just wrong" or "my god says it's wrong." Try and justify your beliefs to yourself again and eliminate these two options from your reasoning and you will find it much more difficult to hate gays.

[bobcat]

Ok answer me this question.

What would you do if you son/daughter said they were gay to you?

That's all I wanna know? And answer honestly.

I have 2 gay friends and it's fine by me. They're not drag queens, they are not sick, it's who they are. They have told me so many times that they don't "choose" it, it's the way they are born.

And before anyone starts thinking I'm gay, I'm NOT. I just had a real good friend of mine who came out and I didn't expect him to at all. NOBODY knew. He had a hard time dealing with it, and he told me it was no choice.

So for all the ignorant people in this forum...........

if your son/daughter doesn't choose to be gay and is born that way, what would you do?

[GameKinG]

They were born gay? Was there some gene in their body that was gay? I always thought there would have be an influence or lack liking things the same way as most. They probably started young though. And its definetely not 'God's choice'.

[DeathsHand]

Stonecutter seems to be defending gays like Pjacks did back at Ndose :D

And he was from chicago too... :hmm:

Only he was the one who always brought up the "Born gay" issue...

Is Chicago like the gay defender capital of the US? :sneaky:

Not that there's anything wrong with that, I'm just bored...

and like I said, I don't have a problem with gays in ze first place so *shrugs*...

Oh but about the born gay issue, I dunno... I don't think that sounds right to me... I don't think people are born gay...

But that's just me...

[TheGame]

I think it's wrong, unnatural, sickning, disgusting, etc

I have gay people in my family (well 2, and they don't live here) and I think they are very nice people. But, I don't agree with thier actions and I believe that they will go to hell if they continue it. Period.

It's their life, I can't change them. To me, they just made a bad decision.

now for this:

Homosexual couple, 2 men (for the purpose of this demonstration, i'm just going to use men, because I'm sure most men are hypocritical and have absolutely no problem with lesbians

It's hard for a man to have problems with a lesbian, because we can relate to them. If I woke up tomorrow morning and I was a girl I would be the gayest girl in town.

but when I look at men, I can't relate to them... just like I can't relate to a girl talking about being sexually involved with another man... so the example of "if a woman woke up as a man, could you relate to it" can't be used, because HELLLLLLLL no I can't relate.

and that's all I got to say about that

[DeathsHand]

Errr... if gay guys go to hell, wouldn't lesbians too?

"It's hard for a man to have problems with a lesbian, because we can relate to them. If I woke up tomorrow morning and I was a girl I would be the gayest girl in town."

You just say that cuz you're a guy and you're not sexually attracted by men... heh... If you were a girl (and not a guy who turned into a girl ;) ) I doubt you'd see things the same way... Especially since you couldn't be a lesbian or you'd go to hell OH NO RUN AAHHH! :unsure: ;)

I don't have a PROBLEM with lesbians, just like I don't have a problem with gays, but I hate it when people are like "OH BOOO DOWN WITH GAYS! *continues watching lesbian porn*"...

And I hate it how religion just causes negative feelings towards things... ;) But let's not get into that...

[Shadow_Link]

Originally posted by DeathsHand
Errr... if gay guys go to hell, wouldn't lesbians too?

"It's hard for a man to have problems with a lesbian, because we can relate to them. If I woke up tomorrow morning and I was a girl I would be the gayest girl in town."

You just say that cuz you're a guy and you're not sexually attracted by men... heh... If you were a girl (and not a guy who turned into a girl ;) ) I doubt you'd see things the same way... Especially since you couldn't be a lesbian or you'd go to hell OH NO RUN AAHHH! :unsure: ;)

I don't have a PROBLEM with lesbians, just like I don't have a problem with gays, but I hate it when people are like "OH BOOO DOWN WITH GAYS! *continues watching lesbian porn*"...

And I hate it how religion just causes negative feelings towards things... ;) But let's not get into that...

I think when he talks about gays he doesn't just mean men.

[DeathsHand]

Originally posted by Shadow_Link


I think when he talks about gays he doesn't just mean men.

Mayhaps this is true...

Mayhaps...

:unsure:

[GameKinG]

Mayhaps, nothing! (sorry, I just wanted to say that)...

Anyway, I feel the same for both genders. But Im just less dusgusted by lesbians, because I'm a guy. Human nature.

[bobcat]

Originally posted by GameKinG
They were born gay? Was there some gene in their body that was gay? I always thought there would have be an influence or lack liking things the same way as most. They probably started young though. And its definetely not 'God's choice'.

I heard that there is no scientific evidence to prove this. Maybe there is. Then if it is a gene, wouldn't it be treated the same way as a disability or something :unsure:

No he told me that's how he's always been :confused: He was really upset about it. At first I didn't know wot to say/do, but after time, I just learnt to accept it.

Unless you know somebody close who is gay, many people cast an ignorant opinion about them (aka some ppl here).

[BlueFire]

Originally posted by bobcat


I heard that there is no scientific evidence to prove this. Maybe there is. Then if it is a gene, wouldn't it be treated the same way as a disability or something :unsure:

No he told me that's how he's always been :confused: He was really upset about it. At first I didn't know wot to say/do, but after time, I just learnt to accept it.

Unless you know somebody close who is gay, many people cast an ignorant opinion about them (aka some ppl here). I don't think it's the genes that cause a person to be gay (at least according to those studies or whatever). I think it's some chemical imbalance. Heh.

[GameKinG]

I still think it can be influenced either way with healthy dose of sosciety. ;)

[TheGame]

Originally posted by DeathsHand
Errr... if gay guys go to hell, wouldn't lesbians too?

Yes

[DeathsHand]

Originally posted by TheGame


Yes

Damn straight! BURN, LESBIANS, BURN!!! :unsure:

J/K

[Drunk Hobbit]

I just find it kind of funny how anything in this forum can end up leading to religious beliefs.

Anywhoo I think their was some evidence off homosexuality being in a person's chemical makeup rather than just a personal choice.

I go to an artsy school so of course there's gonna be some gay people. The lesbians usually aren't hot but oh well. Just can get annoying when someone gay tries to act extremely gay. I think you know what I mean. But the people I know who are gay and out of the closet so to speak don't try to come on to random people or anything so I don't see why it should bother people.

I actually know someone who got a sex change but that's another story...

[GameKinG]

I do notice fat trucker women seem to be lesbian. Maybe its in their chemical makeup.

[Drunk Hobbit]

Both from CNN:

Scientists have found new evidence that suggests male homosexuality has a genetic link. The research supports a similar study two years ago.

Researchers studied pairs of homosexual brothers, focusing on the X chromosome, which men inherit from their mothers. The new study suggests a particular portion of that chromosome helps influence whether a man is gay.

"Our result says that genes are involved in male sexual orientation, although they certainly do not determine a person's sexual orientation," said Dean Hamer, a researcher at the National Cancer Institute and author of the study. "There probably are other biological factors like hormones, for example, and other variables we simply don't know anything about yet."

Previous studies also have suggested a biological influence in sexual orientation, but scientists still can't explain what makes a person gay, heterosexual or bisexual. The study does not identify any specific gene. Hamer said there was no way to know how strongly the gene influences the development of male homosexuality.

Hamer worked with colleagues at the National Institute of Health, the University of Colorado at Boulder and the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research. They examined 32 pairs of exclusively or mostly gay brothers from unrelated families. Twenty-two pairs, or two-thirds, shared the same version of the genetic material, suggesting that it contains a gene predisposing the men to homosexuality.

Researchers looked for a similar effect in women but found no evidence to support the theory. The study appears in the November issue of the journal Nature Genetics.

The possibility that sexual orientation may be predisposed before birth gained new support in a research project being published this week that tested how women respond to sound.

Scientists at the University of Texas, Austin, say they have found the first strong evidence of a physical difference between lesbians and straight women -- a finding that the inner ears of gay women work more like those of men.

The study is to be published Tuesday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The origin of homosexuality has long been a matter of contention. Some believe it to be a matter of choice, but others -- including many gay people -- say it is not choice but biology.

Previous research has found that two parts of the brain are different in gay and heterosexual men. Other studies have found that some genes differ between gay and straight men.

Excess exposure to male hormones before birth cited
The Texas scientists said they found the inner ears of lesbians have undergone "masculinization," probably from excess exposure to male hormones before birth.

"Their auditory centers have been masculinized and the presumption is that so have the sites in the brain that direct sexual preference," said Dennis McFadden, the lead author of the study.

It has yet to be proven, however, that there is a specific site in the brain that directs women to be lesbians, he said.

Dr. Michael Bailey of Northwestern University said the research is "compelling" and may be "consistent with the biological origin of lesbianism."

"The most likely interpretation," he said, "is that this represents some kind of effect of early hormones on the developing fetus."

Test results considered tentative
Bailey cautioned, however, that the research will not be accepted as valid until other scientists replicate the experiment.

Sandra Witelson, an expert on brain anatomy and sexual orientation at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, said the study supports the theory that lesbianism may be "related to early factors in brain development."

Researchers stress that while science can measure trends among groups, it cannot predict sexual orientation for individuals, a caution that lesbian Laura Brown of Atlanta agrees with. The prospect that women might be tested and given hormones to control their sexuality is "frightening," says Brown. 119K / 9 sec. AIFF or WAV sound

How test was conducted
The inner ear difference between homosexual and heterosexual women was detected using a test that measures the function of the cochlea, a key sound amplifier in the inner ear, said McFadden, a professor of experimental psychology.

The cochlea amplifier in women is more sensitive than that of men, giving women an increased ability to detect very soft sounds in a very quiet room. The test measures a very slight sound the cochlea makes when responding to a soft clicking sound.

Females, with their more sensitive cochlea, respond more powerfully to this test than do men, said McFadden. This is true even among infants.

To test for differences between the sexes, the researchers recruited more than 200 adults divided into four groups: homosexual women and men, and heterosexual women and men.

Some from each of the four groups were later identified as bisexual. The sexual orientation of the subjects was determined by questionnaire.

The results, McFadden said, indicated that lesbians had click-responses that were significantly weaker than those of heterosexual women.

The signal was weaker still for all males, both gay and straight. Bisexual men and women were in the middle, although McFadden said there were not enough of these to draw firm conclusions.

What is clear, he said, is that there is a dramatic difference in the development of the hearing systems of lesbians and heterosexual women. It also is known that development of the inner ear is affected before birth by androgens, a male hormone.

Androgens, said McFadden, may also "alter the brain centers that produce sexual orientation." But he said researchers have yet to find a brain structure that determines sexual orientation in women.

[playa_playa]

This horse-trodden topic has reared its face on so many different media that finding such subject here on this board for the first time seems astonishing.

The arguments, the prejudices and the bigotry that abound are all interchangeable in every single one of these discussions. In fact, they are so tediously congruent that reading them serves as a definition of a deja vu.

What I will say is this: the arguments really break down into a few parts -

1)Is the primary purpose of sex an attainment of pleasure?

2)Is homosexuality genetic (hence the_natural_argument)?

3)If, in fact, it is, does it mean predestination with an unavoidable pattern of behavior? Or does it mean that an individual is simply predisposed to incline towards this pattern of behavior?

You might think that argument 1 is sort of out of place. But actually, it is relevant in the sense that if homosexuality is genetic, but that genetic component would only mean a predisposition, one would still have a choice to determine a behavioral pattern. That is, just because a man is *inclined* to like men does not mean he has to have sex with men. If the man believes that the primary purpose of sex is not the attainment of pleasure, he would most likely be able to suppress his pleasure in lieu of a purpose he would deem more significant (procreation, for example).

But if the dictates of our genetic makeup absolutely forces someone to be gay, then argument 1 would have no bearing on the matter; as having different-sex relationship would be so taboo to the person who is gay. If this homosexual person were to have sex with a partner of the opposite gender, his/her body would literally shut down - disabling intercourse to take place.

What I find disturbing (and shamelessly intriguing at the same time) is that right now, it's trendy for girls to be bisexual. As a matter of fact, some guys are quite turned on by such a tendency. Now, this sort of perversion would definitely muddy the issue of gay genetics as at least some gay/biseuxal people are having these relationships strictly out of pleasure. If this is so, then homosexuality, at least for these types of people, would be a predisposition - in other words, something that could be controlled rationally.

You know what? There are other types of predispositions. Alcoholism, drug abuse and other forms of common addiction are also determined in the genetic code. Some people are more prone to be addicted to things, while some people are not.

Now, does this mean that those people who are more prone to addiction be given an automatic understanding and sympathy should they destroy their lives in general? Sure, they were on the short end of the stick with that troublesome genetic makeup, but they still had a choice as to remain sober or to go on with their destructive lifestyles.

What I'm trying to say is, it seems that everyone nowdays are blaming genetics for everything that might go awry from the norm of the society. Most homosexuals would have no problem adhering to the belief that this is, in fact, solid truth. But I clearly see an inherent problem with a society where, biology is treated as the sole culprit of a deviant (don't misinterpret this word; I don't mean this in a criminial context) behavior that clearly violates the things biology wholeheartedly supports and depends on in order to continue the cycle of life.

[Jonbo298]

I personally don't care if someone is "gay". If you want to be, go ahead. Just don't try anything on me.:errr:

[Trowser]

Originally posted by Jonbo298
I personally don't care if someone is "gay". If you want to be, go ahead. Just don't try anything on me.:errr:

what go ahead garbage are you talking about?And let that sick **** spread?

[Ridley]

Originally posted by Trowser
what go ahead garbage are you talking about?And let that sick **** spread?

Geez man. This isn't something sick like pedophilia, it's just homosexuality. What the hell is everyone's problem with it anyways? We should thank, that's right thank homosexuals. They help to keep the worldwide population down ;). Then there are the people that really piss me off by saying garbage like, "I doesn't wants thems there guys hitting on me, so's I reckon we could kills them all. Duh-huck.". First of all what makes you think that all gay men want to "hit-on" you? That's like seriously believing every woman wants you, and if you believe that, then get off the crack. Oh and by the way, a lot of gay men don't talk with a lisp and think everything's super while doing a little flopping motion with their hand. I know that's what all your friends with their PhDs must have told you, but they're wrong.

And oh no, I obviously must be a homo if I truly believe all this!! :eek:




:rolleyes:

[jeepnut]

How come everytime someone defends homosexuals in this topic they feel the need to defend their own heterosexuality? I don't remember anyone saying that if you defend gays then you must be one.

It just seems kind of two-sided to me.

[sdtPikachu]

/me wonders if any of you "gay haters" as I shall call you actually KNOW any gay people. Not know as in "there's this gay guy I know, he's such a stinking ***", but know as in are friends with.

My guess is you prbably don't.

Sigh.

[Ridley]

Originally posted by jeepnut
How come everytime someone defends homosexuals in this topic they feel the need to defend their own heterosexuality? I don't remember anyone saying that if you defend gays then you must be one.

It just seems kind of two-sided to me.

Well if you're talking about when I said this :

"And oh no, I obviously must be a homo if I truly believe all this!!"

How does that "defend" my sexuality? That doesn't really tell you anything. That sentence could be taken to mean I'm either homosexual or heterosexual. You just assumed I was implying that I was a heterosexual. Maybe if I had of said, "Oh and I'm not gay, so :p to you" I could see your point. But then again, you may not have been referring to me :sneaky:

[Trowser]

Originally posted by sdtPikachu
/me wonders if any of you "gay haters" as I shall call you actually KNOW any gay people. Not know as in "there's this gay guy I know, he's such a stinking ***", but know as in are friends with.

My guess is you prbably don't.

Sigh.

i do.and he's a teacher:errr:

and hey,dont murderers keep the population down too!:rolleyes: