View Full Version : Bought a Watch ;)
KillerGremlin
09-03-2008, 09:28 AM
I've had my eye on a SKX Seiko dive watch all summer...so, I finally had a tiny bit of extra cash (not really...I'm in college, haha) and I pulled the trigger. This is a dive watch, actually it's an ISO rated diver:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_6425
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diving_watch
So...I could go diving with this bad boy. But I won't...because I don't do scuba.
Anyway, the watch has a giant Bezel (the thing you twist on the watch that goes 'click') to keep track of the time. It is, literally, an analog stopwatch. Also, the watch is in a shade of hot yellow, which I think is awesome. The reason they use yellow is because when you are under water the amount of light becomes less and less, so it becomes more difficult to see distinct colors. I believe red is the easiest color to see under water, followed by orange, followed by yellow. Finally, the watch features a fully automatic movement...like they had in the old days. No battery. So, I'll have to wind the watch when I want to use it. It is self-winding so all I need to do is put it on a shake my wrist.
Anyway, it should be arriving on Friday, and when it does I'll get some formal pictures. Anyway, here's the stock photo:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51421WC9E7L._SS400_.jpg
http://www.makedostudio.com/watches/seiko-divers/albums/album19/SKXA35_1.jpg
Fox 6
09-03-2008, 11:42 AM
You should go to your local swimming pool just so you can tell time underwater.
KillerGremlin
09-03-2008, 12:18 PM
You should go to your local swimming pool just so you can tell time underwater.
Haha, don't think I won't do it :p .
I watched Goldfinger the other day...and at the beginning part where Bond gets out of the water and he checks the time on his Rolex Submariner...totally awesome.
http://www.bondcollection.com.ar/prueba_shop/secuencia_goldfinger.gif
How iconic is that? Bond totally iconized diver watches.
I was considering going with the black-faced model of the watch I ordered, but yellow just seems so modern and flashy...and I already have an all black watch. Black is definitely classic though.
BreakABone
09-03-2008, 12:26 PM
Bond has iconized a lot of things.
Beautiful women. Fast cars. Expensive gadgets.
The life every guy wants to live.
But yeah he also has some pretty awesome watches (outside of the gadgets)
manasecret
09-03-2008, 12:32 PM
"Self-winding watch" made me think, how in the hell? I figured maybe it was actually using some fancy bit of electronics available these days that harnesses the energy from vibrations.
But alas, no. It really is a self-winding mechanism, that harnesses the energy from your moving arm and gravity. Observe:
http://static.howstuffworks.com/mpeg/q285.mpg
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/question285.htm
KillerGremlin
09-03-2008, 12:33 PM
Bond has iconized a lot of things.
Beautiful women. Fast cars. Expensive gadgets.
The life every guy wants to live.
He's a playboy...Fleming's Bond character was written when the iconic playboy ideal was rising. I wish I could have been around in the 60s, those seemed like a fun time to live.
BreakABone
09-03-2008, 12:40 PM
He's a playboy...Fleming's Bond character was written when the iconic playboy ideal was rising. I wish I could have been around in the 60s, those seemed like a fun time to live.
But you wouldn't know me.
So automatically drops the 60s to the post 85 era of suckitude. :p
and Fleming's Bond from what I understand is more Daniel Craig and less everyone else.
KillerGremlin
09-03-2008, 12:40 PM
"Self-winding watch" made me think, how in the hell? I figured maybe it was actually using some fancy bit of electronics available these days that harnesses the energy from vibrations.
But alas, no. It really is a self-winding mechanism, that harnesses the energy from your moving arm and gravity. Observe:
http://static.howstuffworks.com/mpeg/q285.mpg
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/question285.htm
mechanical watches are as old as time...hehe
As someone who admires technology, I think there is a beauty in mechanical watches that is not present in a battery powered quartz watch.
There are all sorts of watch technologies these days...there are battery powered quartz watches, fully automatic mechanical watches, kinetic watches that store energy in a capacitor generated from your arm movement, solar powered watches that get all their power from light, and mechanical watches that use quartz to regulate the time.
Typically, mechanical watches are much more pricey than quartz watches. That's why your Rolex or Omega costs so much.
KillerGremlin
09-03-2008, 12:44 PM
But you wouldn't know me.
So automatically drops the 60s to the post 85 era of suckitude. :p
Don't worry, if I ever invent a "time machine" I'll invite you.
and Fleming's Bond from what I understand is more Daniel Craig and less everyone else.
Fleming's Bond is introspective, compassionate, racist...and not nearly as interesting as cinema Bond. In my opinion, the better Bond films (From Russia With Love, Goldfinger, Goldeneye) surpass the books by quite a bit. Fleming's Bond actually is an interesting character, and you get to go inside Bond's head in the novels. But, I prefer the womanizing, cracking one-liners, super-hero-esque Bond that we see in the movies.
BreakABone
09-03-2008, 12:49 PM
Don't worry, if I ever invent a "time machine" I'll invite you.
Fleming's Bond is introspective, compassionate, racist...and not nearly as interesting as cinema Bond. In my opinion, the better Bond films (From Russia With Love, Goldfinger, Goldeneye) surpass the books by quite a bit. Fleming's Bond actually is an interesting character, and you get to go inside Bond's head in the novels. But, I prefer the womanizing, cracking one-liners, super-hero-esque Bond that we see in the movies.
I always wondered... is there ever a point where cinema Bond becomes the real Bond and book Bond becomes the basis.
I mean more people are familar with cinema Bond than book Bond, and would find the books to be a bit different than the movies. There are those who complain the movies are too different from the book, but in this case I think that the movies have outlasted the books make them more of the definitive version.
But alas, I am still awesome.
KillerGremlin
09-03-2008, 01:37 PM
I always wondered... is there ever a point where cinema Bond becomes the real Bond and book Bond becomes the basis.
I mean more people are familar with cinema Bond than book Bond, and would find the books to be a bit different than the movies. There are those who complain the movies are too different from the book, but in this case I think that the movies have outlasted the books make them more of the definitive version.
But alas, I am still awesome.
I agree..the movies HAVE outlasted the books. On the other hand...I think Fleming is a fantastically underrated writer. There are probably more outstanding Fleming novels than there are outstanding Bond films. I mean...if you break down the Bond films, there are only 5 or 6 really good films (excluding Casino Royale).
The thing is, Fleming is long dead. Had he continued to write the books maybe he would have outlasted his film series. But, I still think not. Films like Dr. No, Goldfinger, and From Russia With Love became iconic cinema pieces and popular culture works.
Anyway, to get to your question...Sean Connery's Bond definitely had some moments where he became "the real Bond" in my opinion. Unfortunately, as time moved forward the direction of the Bond films was for more one liners, more sight gags, more crazy exotic locations, more over-the-top gadgets, and more ludicrous plots. By the time Roger Moore was starring as Bond, the films had started to become a parody of themselves.
Goldeneye is THE exception...it's a great fucking film, and I love Pierce Brosnan as Bond. Unfortunately, the rest of the Pierce films are walking parodies of themselves. I mean, they didn't even need to make Austin Powers...just go watch Die Another Day. What a horrible, horrible, hilarious film.
There's a great gag in Austin Powers:
[Austin and Vanessa see a man decapitated]
Austin Powers: Not the time to lose one's head.
Vanessa Kensington: No.
Austin Powers: That's not the way to get ahead in life.
Vanessa Kensington: No.
Austin Powers: It's a shame he wasn't more headstrong.
Vanessa Kensington: Hmm.
Austin Powers: He'll never be the head of a major corporation.
Vanessa Kensington: Okay, that'll do.
Austin Powers: Okay.
Apparently the Bond guys didn't get the memo, because they took the joke too far.
Anyway, Casino Royale is a much needed reboot for the Bond franchise. I don't think Craig is Connery...but I think Craig is a bit closer to the book version of Bond that Connery was. So maybe that is a good thing.
As for the people who act all high and mighty by bringing up Fleming's Bond? Honestly, cinema Bond is THE James Bond. We live in a day of age where people who read think they are the exception, and I think there is some arrogance with their opinion.
Anyway...as for me. I said there are 5 or 6 really good Bond films...the rest are pretty horrible, but I enjoy the campiness. I actually thought Die Another Day was a horrible but fun film...as was Moonraker and Live and Let Die.
For me...cinema is the ultimate form of mindless escapism. And, I enjoy the womanizing, one-liner-cracking Bond. I think the new Bond franchise is just a tad bit cold (at the moment). I thought the same thing about Batman Begins, but The Dark Knight was the step forward that I needed. So...hopefully Bond will be a little more happy in Quantum of Solace.
BreakABone
09-03-2008, 03:45 PM
5 or 6 you say?
I will give the nod to most of Connery's stuff
From Russia with love
Goldfinger
You Only Live Twice
I like
On Her Majesty's Secret Service
I honestly like both of Dalton's
Goldeneye is awesome. and Tomorrow Never Dies is a fun action movie.
Casino Royale is awesome.
The Moore era was kind of a joke. Literally, Bond is a clown in one of the movies.
Angrist
09-03-2008, 03:49 PM
Hah, you're not going to make me buy an expensive watch like you did with sunglasses. :D
KillerGremlin
09-04-2008, 12:38 AM
Hah, you're not going to make me buy an expensive watch like you did with sunglasses. :D
Do you have a watch? :p
I bet I can find you a nice, quality watch in the $70-300 dollar range.
BreakABone
09-04-2008, 12:45 AM
To continue down two roads
http://watches.infoniac.com/uimg/omega-seamaster-diver-300m-james-bond-watch.jpg
For the spy who loves you.
KillerGremlin
09-04-2008, 01:01 AM
To continue down two roads
http://watches.infoniac.com/uimg/omega-seamaster-diver-300m-james-bond-watch.jpg
For the spy who loves you.
That is quite an elegant, expensive watch. :p
If I ever had several thousand to spend on a watch...I'd definitely consider an Omega. Sam's Club had an Omega Speedmaster on display the other week...it was hot.
Personally, I prefer Omega's styling to Rolex's.
KillerGremlin
09-06-2008, 01:27 PM
Well...my watch came....
I'm stuck with phone pictures for now, so pardon the crapiness :p
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/7219/0905081434wn5.jpg
very yellow
http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/7052/0905081455ni4.jpg
still love the yellow
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/527/0906081216ew0.jpg
There's the bezel (the coin-edged thing that you see people turning on their watch, it goes 'click click click'). You can also see the crown/stem, the thing you pull out to set the time/date.
http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/3791/0906081217vg3.jpg
Seiko watches are notorious for their "lume." It's a paint on all the markers and it just glows awesome in the dark.
Looks nice. Congrats on the new purchase.
I've been reading this ever since you first made the thread, but just now realized that it was a Seiko. I have a Seiko myself, one with a black and gray checkered faceplate, and I just love it.
KillerGremlin
09-06-2008, 02:19 PM
Looks nice. Congrats on the new purchase.
I've been reading this ever since you first made the thread, but just now realized that it was a Seiko. I have a Seiko myself, one with a black and gray checkered faceplate, and I just love it.
Just from Internet testimony, Seiko seems to be one of the better producers of low-end/mid-range watches, along with Citizen, Orient and Pulsar (imo). I've seen the checkered look on some of the Seikos, and it is pretty hot. Is your watch a chronograph?
Just from Internet testimony, Seiko seems to be one of the better producers of low-end/mid-range watches, along with Citizen, Orient and Pulsar (imo). I've seen the checkered look on some of the Seikos, and it is pretty hot. Is your watch a chronograph?
Yes, it is. One with two red circles on the top and bottom.
KillerGremlin
09-06-2008, 02:51 PM
Yes, it is. One with two red circles on the top and bottom.
does it look kind of like this?
http://bp2.blogger.com/_W9PflxQfc38/Rq9T49Ba8hI/AAAAAAAAAHc/3yLd7IxQLoY/s320/SND519.jpg
or this:
http://www.creativewatch.co.uk/pimages/snac03p1-seiko-f1-honda-racing-watch-large.jpg
It's a lot like the first one, but a little less bulkier. The white circles are red, and the hands are white. And it doesn't have those little numbers around the perimeter (whatever it's called :))
I would've taken a picture if it was possible, instead of talking about it blindly :)
RagedHybrid
09-07-2008, 02:34 AM
This my current watch:
http://www.princetonwatches.com/images/watches/BL5290-59E.jpg
Don't really use it too much but i like it
Angrist
09-07-2008, 10:46 AM
Ok, here's my watch:
It's the closest I can find to my watch.
http://www.sacherimport.nl/watch/funtimer/AW-24-2BV-ohne.gif
Mine doesn't have the numbers 1-12 and the symbols are gold-colored. Like this:
http://www.sacherimport.nl/watch/funtimer/AW-5B-1EV-ohne.gif
I really love it, I've had it for more than 5 years.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.