View Full Version : Next NEXT generation graphics!
Crash
05-10-2005, 03:56 AM
BETTER THAN FINAL FANTASY MOVIE GRAPHICS
Whoever said that graphics aren't going to get much better than they are now, are out of their freaking minds, look what they are working on now, and in 5 years, this is what gaming will look like... pretty much indistinguishable from real life. The hard part will be making it so you can blow up graphics this good (turok style)
http://www.ict.usc.edu/graphics/research/afrf/jessi.123.jpg
click on the movie below to see how they captured animations, and can dynamically do lighting and facial animation while using a moving camera. My guess is by NEXT next generation, they will be able to render a whole environment and multiple people with this technology.
http://www.ict.usc.edu/graphics/research/afrf/animatable_facial_reflectance_fields.avi
.
bobcat
05-10-2005, 08:02 AM
amazing, however if you look on the right hand side of her face (our left) it's a dead giveaway that it ain't real.
Also she's missing a shoulder
Dark Samurai
05-10-2005, 09:31 AM
That look unbelievable (duh right?)
lol at the missing shoulder...
Jonbo298
05-10-2005, 10:11 AM
Still impressive.
I'd load a shotgun into that anyday :p Real looking or not :p
Teuthida
05-10-2005, 10:43 AM
She looks like one of my old co-workers. That bitch...
GameMaster
05-10-2005, 12:32 PM
Those graphics are amazing and awe inspiring. Although that example is very ugly.
Graphics this real will finally open the doors to video game pr0n. Where players can control the position, stamina, and amount of noise made. Probably not on the Nintendo system but whatever other game companies still exist.
Also she's missing a shoulder
I hope they're able to fix the shoulder bug in the next 5 years or the industry will come to a grinding halt.
Stray_Bullet
05-10-2005, 01:11 PM
I hope they're able to fix the shoulder bug in the next 5 years or the industry will come to a grinding halt.
:lol:
I don't really know if I want photo realistic graphics in my videogames...
Dylflon
05-10-2005, 09:38 PM
I think I'd be somewhat disturbed if I had to shoot something that looked THAT real. I like to distinguish real life from video games in the sense of how things look. Imagine a five year old that plays a shooter game where he shoots what look like real people. Definently couldn't be good for young minds.
Typhoid
05-10-2005, 09:50 PM
I think I'd be somewhat disturbed if I had to shoot something that looked THAT real. I like to distinguish real life from video games in the sense of how things look. Imagine a five year old that plays a shooter game where he shoots what look like real people. Definently couldn't be good for young minds.
A 5 year old playing a killer/shooter? Funny, I thought games have age warnings.
And a little kid playing a relaistic Zombie killing game, is no different than that same kid watching a gory zombie movie with lots of decapitation and what have you. That should be worse if anything, because it is with real people.
Please don't try and bring children into arguments about realism in games.
Dylflon
05-10-2005, 09:59 PM
I'm not saying children are supposed to be playing those games. But I know that some of them do.
Do I believe there should be restrictions on video game violence? No.
My worry is that game violence that looks real could have adverse effects on the pysche of a person. I could see it negatively affecting teenagers but I shudder to imagine what it could do to a yound child. As an teen/adult I don't think that even I would be comfortable with such realistic violence.
I just don't think that we need to go there. What's the point?
Typhoid
05-10-2005, 10:02 PM
I'm not saying children are supposed to be playing those games. But I know that some of them do.
Do I believe there should be restrictions on video game violence? No.
My worry is that game violence that looks real could have adverse effects on the pysche of a person. I could see it negatively affecting teenagers but I shudder to imagine what it could do to a yound child. As an teen/adult I don't think that even I would be comfortable with such realistic violence.
I just don't think that we need to go there. What's the point?
Whats the difference between a realistic violent game, and a realistic violent movie? Games are ficticious characters, Movies are real people.
Dylflon
05-10-2005, 10:02 PM
The difference is that in a game you're controlling the violence. And it is a somewhat substantial difference.
Typhoid
05-10-2005, 10:08 PM
The difference is that in a game you're controlling the violence. And it is a somewhat substantial difference.
We shall make a test.
We shall buy 2 babies.
1 shall live on watching the goryest movies for 8 hours a day, every day, for 5 years.
And the other should play the goryest games for 8 hours a day, every day, for 5 years.
One kid would be quoting angelic one-liners while he chops your head off with an axe, and the other would be looking for the "B" button.
Dylflon
05-10-2005, 10:11 PM
Also, I didn't say that violent movies are good for kids. You just like to fish for an argument, don't you? :nod:
Typhoid
05-10-2005, 10:12 PM
Also, I didn't say that violent movies are good for kids. You just like to fish for an argument, don't you? :nod:
No, I'm doing this because you live in a box and your mom is a whore.
GameMaster
05-10-2005, 10:22 PM
Alright you two, let's bring this screeching argument to an end. I don't want to close this thread yet.
Teuthida
05-10-2005, 10:34 PM
:idea:
http://vko.coldwire.net/datas/webtemp/mario.jpg
Though uber-realistic, Mario shall become even more teh kiddy next next gen.
Was gonna use pic of that porn actor dressed as Mario but forgot his name. Rep to one would knows.
The Germanator
05-10-2005, 10:55 PM
:idea:
http://vko.coldwire.net/datas/webtemp/mario.jpg
Though uber-realistic, Mario shall become even more teh kiddy next next gen.
Was gonna use pic of that porn actor dressed as Mario but forgot his name. Rep to one would knows.
Ron Jeremy.
Crash
05-11-2005, 03:31 AM
holy **** typhoid, why all the aggression. You've been playing too many M rated games haven't you.
bobcat
05-11-2005, 07:20 AM
The difference is that in a game you're controlling the violence. And it is a somewhat substantial difference.
A classic example is Zelda.............with the chickens. (ALTTP)
DarrenMcLeod
05-11-2005, 08:50 PM
Danchastu - the img doesn't work.
fingersman
05-13-2005, 01:22 PM
No, I'm doing this because you live in a box and your mom is a whore.
Now why would you say something like that?
With machines as poweful as that, the next Perfect dark game may even look as good as PS1 quality! SWEEEET!
Typhoid
05-13-2005, 05:18 PM
Now why would you say something like that?
Because I'm joking and he knows I am?
Stray_Bullet
05-13-2005, 10:04 PM
Because I'm joking and he knows I am?
Because you're trying to beat me to being the first DD.
BTW, don't blame jack **** on "just kidding." Even if you are just a kid. Kid Emo.
Canyarion
05-16-2005, 01:15 PM
Nice graphics, but I'm still not very impressed. When in a game are you gonna see someone so close-up?
Nice graphics, but I'm still not very impressed. When in a game are you gonna see someone so close-up?
First-Person RPG
;)
Canyarion
05-16-2005, 02:31 PM
Yay, this will be the age of FP-RPGs. :rolleyes:
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.