Time Magazine's Person of The Year:

[GameMaster]

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/12/19/time.moy.bush.reut/index.html

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2004/US/12/19/time.moy.bush.reut/vert.bush.cover.ap.jpg


U.S. President George W. Bush's bold, uncompromising leadership and his clear-cut election victory made him Time magazine's Person of the Year for 2004, its managing editor said Sunday.

[Bond]

I can't wait to see how far off subject this thread will go...

[Perfect Stu]

meh.

[Acebot44]

I think it should have been Paris Hilton.

[Happydude]

i think it should have been me!

[Typhoid]

I can't wait to see how far off subject this thread will go...



Don't goats have wierd necks?

[Jonbo298]

*leaves comments to self*

[Canyarion]

I can't wait to see how far off subject this thread will go...
Bah, I'm almost through my data limit (I know, it sucks, but there's only ADSL here and no cable), so I have to wait 2 days before I can DL again. I have to pay like €1 for every 100MB over the limit! :mad:


thanks to Typhoid of course

[Professor S]

I actually think that whoever won this election would have won this dubious honor, considering how charged it was and the worldwide ramifications of it.

I say dubious because the Man of the Year award is not just awarded to those considered to have a necessarily "good" affect, just those that have had a resounding one. (That should appease you dastardly liberals out there ;) )

[Stonecutter]

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/12/19/time.moy.bush.reut/index.html

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2004/US/12/19/time.moy.bush.reut/vert.bush.cover.ap.jpg

What an awful, awful picture.

I know it's a painting, it's still horrid.

[BlueFire]

What an awful, awful picture.

I know it's a painting, it's still horrid.
The painting itself isn't that good either.

[Ace195]

Yeah it does kinda suck.. I think it's good that bush is getting nominated for person of the year.. Who else is he running against ? eh ? lol kerry ? hahahah

[dropCGCF]

Wow. I guessed him before I read the thread.

[The Germanator]

I say dubious because the Man of the Year award is not just awarded to those considered to have a necessarily "good" affect, just those that have had a resounding one. (That should appease you dastardly liberals out there ;) )

It's true. Hitler won man of the year from Time a while back, so it isn't always a good man.

*never made a Bush/Hitler comparison here, just saying.

[Stonecutter]

The painting itself isn't that good either.
*Rimshot*

He'll be here all week, folks!

[Jason1]

The painting itself isn't that good either.


Wait, I know that statement bashes Bush in some way, I just dont exactly get it...and I seirously want to get it because im sure I agree and im sure its really funny...

bad wording possibly?

[Professor S]

Bush bashing doesn't ever need to make sense. All you have to do is nod your head and agree, just like every good Bush hater does.

[Typhoid]

Bush bashing doesn't ever need to make sense. All you have to do is nod your head and agree, just like every good Bush hater does.


Everyone who hates anything does that.

If you hate cheese....you nod and agree.
Do you hate hippies? Nod and agree.
What about dogs? Nod and agree.

Its not limited to Bush my friend.

[Canyarion]

*nods and agrees* :nod:

[Teuthida]

What an awful, awful picture.

I know it's a painting, it's still horrid.

At least it got his squint down.

[Blackmane]

*nods and agrees* :nod:

:D lol