View Full Version : Police Use Stun Gun On 6-Year-Old Boy
GameMaster
11-12-2004, 03:30 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/11/12/child.tasered.ap/index.html
The boy, who was not identified, was shocked with 50,000 volts on October 20 at Kelsey Pharr Elementary School.
Do you agree with the officer's choice? Do you have any comical headlines for this story?
Blackmane
11-12-2004, 05:05 PM
That is ridiculous! There is no need for use of any weapon against a 6 year old unless the cop is a pansy.
Typhoid
11-12-2004, 05:22 PM
The officers talked to the boy without success. When the boy cut his own leg, one officer shocked him with a Taser and another grabbed him to prevent him from falling, police said.
Ok....how weak do you have to be that you cant even take a little kid. He is friggin 6 for gods sake.
Just grad the arm with the piece of glass in it. Mission accomplished.
The title by itself is misleading. The SUBtitle, however, makes a heck of a lot more sense. When it's completely in context, I have absolutely no problems with what the officers decided to do.
Su-Yin
11-12-2004, 06:09 PM
i read bout this bout a day ago...i guess theres two ways of looking at this...the policeman tried to save the kid...but hes a wuss...so he zaps the kid to make him unconscious b4 actually grabbing him....if not the kid might hurt him as well......i guess this also depends how big that piece of glass is.....*shrug* i wouldnt mind having a cut or two from glass instead of zapping a tiny 6 year old.
thats what the bug zappers for; to zap the person before he causes harm to himself or others. he already cut himself, if he reaches for him, he cuts himself more. Quickest way to solve it is to zap him.
and if i was the parent, i'd much rather have my kid zaped then to let him cut himself with glass.
Cop did the right thing. its not like he shot him, or took the flashlight to the back of the kids head. sheesh.
Blackmane
11-12-2004, 06:22 PM
Yea, I didn't read the story, only the little subtext. That makes sense. The subtext was a little misleading.
Crash
11-12-2004, 06:28 PM
yeah, i'm with the officer, he did what he needed to do...
bet the kid will think twice before pulling a stunt like that again.
Su-Yin
11-12-2004, 07:38 PM
i dont know....mayb i feel this way bcuz ive been zapped b4 and seriously...it isnt a very nice feeling....and that on a 6 YEAR OLD kid wud b hell....its not a teenager who can think of ways to fight back....dont just stand there, just grab the damn kid with ur arms and take the piece of glass away instead of watching him cut himself...:hmm:
Typhoid
11-12-2004, 07:48 PM
and if i was the parent, i'd much rather have my kid zaped then to let him cut himself with glass.
Cop did the right thing. its not like he shot him, or took the flashlight to the back of the kids head. sheesh.
But the kid did cut himself.
The thing I dont get is he had to use a stun gun. or whatever on a 6 year old kid....I mean...like....I could just grab his glass wielding arm, and Voila...no more glass wielding.
The kid is 6. 6. Yes, 6. Its not like he lifts weights every day, or like, hangs out with all the little 6 year old drug dealers that will kill you if ou touch him.
I personally know a local sherriff in my area who carries around a taser gun.
You don't want to get hit with those electrode prongs.
I've seen pictures with seven guys holding hands and the two prongs attached to the two outer men. It took them to their knees and kept them there no problem.
I personally think that 50 000 volts into a 6 yr old kid is excessive force. I've fooled around with some electric fences that aren't nearly as powerful as one of those tasers...and it hurt...a lot.
I'd rather have a flashlight to the back of my head or a quick little flick of a baton on my wrist. The kid would've dropped the glass in that case...and the officer wouldn't have had to break his arm or anything...just a nice bruise.
just my opinion.....but if you've had a serious electrical shock before, 50 000 volts with decent amp is serious ****, especially with a 6 year old body.
Perfect Stu
11-12-2004, 09:14 PM
the cop stopped the kid from further injuring himself, possibly severely
anyone that calls the cop a 'wuss' is terribly immature
Typhoid
11-12-2004, 09:17 PM
the cop stopped the kid from further injuring himself, possibly severely
anyone that calls the cop a 'wuss' is terribly immature
But like, how do you people not understand the easyness in grabbing a 6 year olds arm.
I can see resorting to a taser if the kid had a gun. But it was a piece of friggin glass. You smack his hand, or grab his arm, and job done. You need no tasing.
Try it yourself.
Find a 6 year old.
Grab his arm.
See how easy it is for you to restrain him.
Now take a taser to that kid and see how bad it hurts him.
EDIT:
Stunning a 6 year old with glass when you can easily grab his arm, is like shooting a knife wielding guy with a gun when you can just swarm him and tackle him.
Perfect Stu
11-12-2004, 09:31 PM
You dont just 'smack someone on the arm' that's holding a sharp piece of glass. With a piece of glass, it doesnt take much force at all to cut. A swift movement while someone is trying to grab the kid could be dangerous.
And when the hell do you swarm someone wielding a knife?! If you threaten a police officer with a knife, they could shoot you in the leg.
I really doubt that a 6-year-old whose gotten the idea of killing himself with glass is that easy to handle, Typhoid. You're over-generalizing when you say kids that are 6 are all pushovers. You've read the article, but were you there? The kid was probably screaming his head off hysterically. Even tots are vicious. It was probably the best choice to zap him - both psychologically and physically. Do you think it's fair to have 20-30somethings rampaging after a little 6-year-old?
We've been mislead. The purpose of the article was not to say that some random kid was pumped with a high voltage. The purpose was to show that this kid had a problem at X location, and the cops handled it by doing Y thing, and the kid seems to be fine.
Perfect Stu
11-12-2004, 09:44 PM
Headline: Man-eating-gorilla climbs Empire State Building, proceeds to sing 'Yellow Submarine'
Article: LOLS WOULDNT THAT BE FUNNY IF IT HAPPENED? OBVIOUSLY IT'S FAKE BECAUSE THAT COULDNT POSSIBLY HAPPEN. APRIL FOOLS, HEHEHE HAHAHA!
later that day:
"hey, did you hear some gorilla sang on top of the Empire State building? yeah...it's pretty crazy, man...make sure not to get eaten. I'm DEAD serious"
Typhoid
11-12-2004, 11:49 PM
You're over-generalizing when you say kids that are 6 are all pushovers.
I never said they were pushovers.
Im saying nomatter how crazy a 6 year old is, he is still a 6 year old. Unless the kid lifts weights every day, you just smack his arm with something and restrain him. Hes 6. Now, I could understand the taser if the kid was like, 10 or 12. But 6? Thats like, Kindergarten still. (depending on month)
Are you saying you coudnt restrain a Kindergartener?
And when the hell do you swarm someone wielding a knife?! If you threaten a police officer with a knife, they could shoot you in the leg.
Did the Toddler threaten the police?
. With a piece of glass, it doesnt take much force at all to cut. A swift movement while someone is trying to grab the kid could be dangerous.
Yes, and it would be equally as easy to smack the kids arm with a club, or mag-light. Those things arnt light you know. If you give a good smack, it hurts.
Joeiss
11-13-2004, 12:40 AM
Stun gunning the kid willl hurt him less than cutting his own jugular with the glass.
Happydude
11-13-2004, 12:52 AM
i'm on the cops' side here...they did the right thing, they stopped him before he could deal further injury to himself or others...
Perfect Stu
11-13-2004, 12:57 AM
Stun gunning the kid willl hurt him less than cutting his own jugular with the glass.
and that's exactly what it comes down to. plain and simple.
the cops handled it...if the cop had tried to "whack the toddler on the hand" and the kid ended up cutting something and further damage was done, people would be saying "why didnt the cop use the stun gun?! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!"
and I never said the kid threatened the cop...he threatened to hurt himself, but that's besides the point. you used a person-with-a-knife example, and I was referring to that.
Jonbo298
11-13-2004, 01:08 AM
Good choice by the cop. CNN needs to drop this story because its something that drags on for months for no ****ing reason *cough Scott Peterson*
I never said they were pushovers.
Im saying nomatter how crazy a 6 year old is, he is still a 6 year old. Unless the kid lifts weights every day, you just smack his arm with something and restrain him. Hes 6. Now, I could understand the taser if the kid was like, 10 or 12. But 6? Thats like, Kindergarten still. (depending on month)
Are you saying you coudnt restrain a Kindergartener?
Pushover is another way of saying easy to handle. That was what you were talking about.
There's some pretty crazy ass kids out there. You just haven't taught an elementary class yet.
Hero2
11-13-2004, 05:40 AM
Thank you GM for that shocking discovery. It seems you have electrified the board with this headline. =-D
Blackmane
11-13-2004, 02:10 PM
Officer Scandal
DAY 2
Acebot44
11-13-2004, 02:15 PM
I don't see any problem with what the officer did but having not been there I don't know whether it was needed. I tutor 2nd graders every week at the local elementary school and there's nothing that a swift smack to the face can't handle :)
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.